so the thing about my family is that we have two ancestors on my dad’s side who were buried in france, where I currently live. one died in the spanish civil war, and one died prior doing…we don’t know what. but he somehow managed to get buried in père lachaise.
so anyhow, my gran sends me a message like “pls put flowers on ur uncle samuel’s grave because he’s gone over a century with none and it will make the ghost mad if he hasn’t already” because my family spends time in europe but never long enough to go all the way to père lachaise and give ya boy samuel jr. his death rites. so im like “ok gran I can do that” bc im a good grandson and you do not fuck with gran she doesn’t DESERVE THAT
i figure out which plot he’s on and ask someone specifically where you can find uncle samuel jr. and they tell me where and so I arrive at the junction and.
HE GONE.
WHERE DID YOU GO UNCLE SAMUEL.
*celine dion’s smash hit “my heart will go on” playing in the distance*
in other words either someone stole my entire great great uncle samuel or he has risen again, ready to party in paris for all of eternity.
I’m really disappointed that this is so over sexualized because pole dancing is really cool
okay, so first of all: this example is not “over sexualised” - this is someone who very possibly has never done a day’s worth of stripping in her life performing some moves in a dance studio. She’s very likely to have had a lifetime of dance and gymnastics training behind her and decided to take poledancing classes when it became the new hit craze. She’s learned in a formal class environment.
But poledancing was developed by strippers in a stripclub environment. Many of those strippers also had a lot of dance and gymnastics and cheerleader training behind them and they developed pole moves partly as a way to kill time when the club was quiet. They taught each other in an informal setting and innovated and created for themselves. Without getting paid explicitly to do so.
Their talent at being able to do things like this has never been recognised. Even though the first pole schools were opened by strippers and taught by strippers, it has now been appropriated by hundreds of people who have never done sex work and who have no respect for sex work, who think it is “sad” that poledancing has a history inextricably entwined with sex work, who only view poledancing as a legitimate artform once it becomes detached from its sex work context despite the fact it was conceived and built in a sex work environment by sex workers.
Poledancing is not “overly sexualised”. It IS a sexualised dance/athletic art and rightly so - it belongs to strippers and it is strippers who made it. Its beauty and athleticism and skill doesn’t change because it was used in a sexualised environment to help its practioners make more money (although now it is seen as just for middle-upper class non-sex workers to pay big bucks in a formal class environment to learn to titillate boyfriends and husbands whilst staying appropriately fit!). That’s a part of its history. Sexualised things are not inherently worth less because of their sexual nature. To believe so is just to devalue the hard work of the sex workers who innovated it and that is done more than enough as is.
Poledancing is still cool and amazing and requires great skill and talent to execute even MORE SO when it is sexualised. Just being able to perform it impressively is one thing; being able to make it a fluid part of a character performance (which is what stripping entails) is another. If you can’t appreciate that, you don’t understand it, so STFU.
this fucking commentary is perfect
Sexualised things are not inherently worth less because of their sexual nature.
every steven universe post: can’t believe amethyst endorsed lebanese consociationalism as an optimal electoral structure for post-conflict power sharing when the definition of consociational democracies is shaky at best and it’s arguable that even lijphart’s archetypal consociational case study doesn’t meaningfully fit the model he presented. also it’s typical that this fandom would demonise pearl for pointing out that consociational democracies require a level of existing cooperation between sectional elites which implies a preceding peace process, one that can rarely be presumed… tbh if you still reblog amethyst after this I’m going to murder your mother
heteros: its just more realistic if gay characters dont say theyre gay…..like why would they need to talk about that
gays: this character is gay!
heteros: um where did they say theyre gay
I have to agree tho,I’d rather see a gay character be seen as gay because they’ve been shown to be gay in canon or mentioned it as part of character development not just “omfg wow look how gay I am lawl!”
if they dont fucking say “im gay” anywhere people like you claim theyre not gay no matter how much “character development” they get, shut the fuck up
like holy shit! heres some examples :^)
pearl (obvious choice): - sings an entire song about missing a woman and not being able to move on from her - got jealous of the man who started becoming a romantic interest in the woman she was in love with - had an episode where she showed interest in a woman
- like holy shit 99% of her character development involves loving a woman
and guess what the fandom does? “that doesnt mean shes gay!” “she just looked up to rose!” and ships her CONSTANTLY with men, one of which she shows huge discomfort with
ruby and sapphire:
- kisses each other in episodes
- flirts with each other
- their fusion literally says shes made of love
and the fandom? “theyre sisters” “its platonic” “its forced”
marceline and princess bubblegum:
- pb smells marcelines shirt
- the crew of that show literally confirmed they used to date each other
and the fandom still deny it!! because theyve been with men before
korra and asami:
- confirmed to be canon
and the fandom denies it and ships one/both of them with men because theyve been with men before
see a pattern here?
THEY’RE KID SHOWS PLEASE FIND SOME OF THOSE THAT ARE TENDED FOR OLDER AUDIENCES AND WE’LL TALK
oh im sorry i didnt realize that gay people were bad for children
today I learned that if you want to slash someone’s tires, don’t slash all four; only slash three because if you slash all four their insurance will pay for it but if you only slash three they have to pay for it all out of pocket
❤
today on satan makes a blog post
Life tip: if someone slashes 3 of your tires, slash the 4th one yourself and blame it on the person who slashed the first 3. Now, your insurance will pay for it.
Life tip: If you slash 3 of their tires, hide out nearby until they discover their slashed tires. Take pictures of them slashing their fourth tire. Show police when they arrive on scene. Convicted of insurance fraud and still have to pay for tires.
i feel like i’m reading a Spy vs Spy comic in text format