Weelee!
Weelee…
Weelee…..
WEELEE
Weelee!
Weelee…
Weelee…..
WEELEE
Anonymous asked: You did too. You said yoy hate people that do it and listed a bunch of reasons
Well if I said I hate people who romanticize poverty and listed people who romanticize poverty, then I probably had a good point.
“I heard my wife knock on the bathroom door, but then I remembered…. our bathroom doesn’t have a door”
I’m sorry, but the confusion of why your bathroom doesn’t have a door far outweighs any feelings of horror this might evoke.
can’t afford door.. the horror here is the realities of life
So what fuck was your wife knocking on
this dick
It’s not even 4 words???
(via deep-sea-prince)
[video]
Anonymous asked: That poverty post thing. It's probably from forever ago now i guess
Except I never said that the post was romanticizing poverty so dafuq?
Anonymous asked: They're not romanticizing it and never said it was good. But they're saying when you get out of it, you'll feel that. Which is true. Of ANY hard times, not just poverty.
I am very confused. Please provide some context.
I’ve come to realize a lot of my favourite pokémon are bipedal with a tail.
Ampharos, Breloom, Exploud, Grumpig, Gengar, Electabuzz, Abomasnow…
I mean, I have to admit, it’s a pretty basic body shape, and seems pretty common. Especially among starters: it seems like 3 out of 4 starter families have at least one bipedal tailed evolution.
Wait, which gen doesn’t have a bipedal starter?
You misunderstand. I didn’t say 1 out of 4 gens don’t have a bipedal tailed starter, I said 1 out of 4 starter families don’t have a bipedal tailed evolution.
So that would be the Venusaur line, the Meganium line, the Typhlosion line, the Torterra line and the Greninja Line. None of those lines have bipedal tailed pokémon in them. All the other starter families do.
Typhlosion is bipedal
I’ve come to realize a lot of my favourite pokémon are bipedal with a tail.
Ampharos, Breloom, Exploud, Grumpig, Gengar, Electabuzz, Abomasnow…
I mean, I have to admit, it’s a pretty basic body shape, and seems pretty common. Especially among starters: it seems like 3 out of 4 starter families have at least one bipedal tailed evolution.
Wait, which gen doesn’t have a bipedal starter?
do you think the designers of shit games like Sonic Boom look back on their creations like “we really fucked up” or “nobody appreciates our hard work”
Game developers know when a game is shit. They worked with it for years, they know it inside and out. For a game like Sonic Boom, there was a TV show tie-in, so it was likely rushed by the higher-ups. The devs might try to focus on where they succeeded (small victories, like maybe a certain character’s animation or something), but they know it overall sucks and probably would avoid putting it first in their resume (unless it sold well).
How about games where it isn’t quite black and white whether a game was good or bad. Like… like when Luigi’s Mansion just came out, and nobody really liked it, but it later became a time-honoured classic. Or when a game is objectively pretty bad, but still sells a fuckton of copies. Or a game that seemed good at the time but aged about as well as milk in hind-sight.
… I suppose that would be different for every individual developer… Shit, I just answered my own question.
Oh, some developers will make a series of shit games and claim that the games are the best games ever and nobody is giving it a chance. They will just say that it’s too deep for gamers to understand. I’m talking about developer david cage who made such steaming piles of shit as indigo prophecy, heavy rain and beyond two souls. He’s the one who said “game overs area failure of a game designer” and can’t design a decent game for his life because he tends to ignore raging plotholes, refuses to give players controle of their character and fails to do basic research on what’s being used in his games. He makes shitty games and is like “nobody appreciates our hard work”
I drew purplicorn the other day on MS paint with my left hand.