tbh it actually makes me happy that a boy having fun with gender presentation is being presented for the most part in a positive light, especially a black boy because people of color are so often more harshly criticized for not conforming to binary gender roles… scrolling through the tag, almost all of the posts were positive or neutral, though a few of them were like “how are people going to rationalize this” or “what is this, some kind of new trend”
Even though I know it’s not true, I can’t shake this thought out of my head… It keeps coming back to me… What if escalators were invented before stairs
i like to use this picture as the ultimate judge when it comes to sleep deprivation because the longer i’ve went without sleep the more hilarious and frustrating this is for some reason and when it reaches a certain level i know that i need to try as hard as i can to get more than five minutes of sleep
club for strangely intelligent but socially awkward brown-haired cartoon nerds
Forgetting someone?
(via )
Anonymous asked: I never notice until now that N° of gems = N° of individual gem components, you know Garnet have 2 gems (ruby [1] + saphire [1]), and Stevonnie 1 [Steven [1] + Connie [0]). so~ I think aside of eyes, gem number could help identify the nuber of gem components, but something is wong here... I can't remember.
Fusions show how many gems there are fused. The sote of the gems base form will be where it is in fusion. Like opal having a gem on her forhead (pearl) and a gem on her chest (amethyst)
