(via zeroyalviking)
Anonymous asked: I can't even think how someone could even think that sounds logical! But oh my god, those people really exist
I once had a mother at Michaels get mad at me because I told her son to stop tearing up some Scrapbook paper we had.
Literally.
The kid was sitting there, tearing sheet of paper after sheet of paper, and I went over and was like “Hey buddy, that’s not yours don’t tear it.” Mid you, the kid was like ya know 4. So my voice was soft but stern. I know how to handle kids.
And the mom (who, by the way, was on the OTHER END of the aisle looking at who knows what with her back turned) marches up to me and grabs her kid as if I was about to shoot him and goes “You don’t have the right to tell my child what to do and what not to do. Don’t come near him!” And then storms out. We got a complaint later about customer harassment.
Another time we had a couple come in with a toddler right? Maybe two years old. And the kid screams the ENTIRE TIME they’re in there. And they’re just shopping like it’s nothing while this child screams his lungs out. My manager goes up to them (which we’re not allowed to do unless we get MANY complaints) and is all “Excuse me, is there anything we can do to help console the child? We’ve gotten complaints from other customers about disturbing them.” And the parents are like “Oh there’s nothing wrong with him. He just likes hearing his voice echo. He does that every time we go in a store.”
Like…
WTF happened to disciplining your child??? This is what leads to spoiled brats like his nephew and my ex boyfriend.
One time I had to slam on the brakes because this 7 yr old got right nito the street. The mother yelled at me for speeding (I was doing 30 which is the limit in neighborhoods) and I told her that she should not let her child play in the middle of the street. She then yelled at me because it’s apparently not my place to help children know about playing safely outside.
Also, a few nights ago, I was delivering a pizza and it was dark and I was going about 20 in a neighborhood because there were MORE children playing in the road at NIGHT and the parents told me to slow down because there was children. I informed them that 30 is the limit and I was going 20 and that they should not yell at people driving when they are letting their children play in the middle of the road at night. They also got mad.
TL;DR Parents think they know exactly what’s best for their children and refuse to let others teach children about how to be safe.
hoonding replied to your post: realtalk ive been drawing wings with v…
yeah your wings are pretty fukkin rad i really need to learn from you on this subject tbh because mine are schiesse
overly simplified method: draw red zigzag first
important structure reference for when you’re actually putting the feathers on:
i mostly cheat and just scribble so much you cant see me fucking up the actual feathers but yeah im lazy
THANKS
(via electricreblogaloo)
The automatic criminalization of black and brown bodies
Now hold on a sec I do INDEED have a problem with one picture but not the other.
In the TOP picture you can clearly see two hunting rifles and a mid-sized handgun, which are perfectly reasonable guns for a family to have, and it appears that all three people in the picture are legally old enough to at least have gone to a hunters safety course, which legally justifies the weapons being in their hands for certain purposes - hunting. Hand guns are carried by hunters to defend against bear attacks, should they happen, and by fishermen when fishing in lakes containing sturgeon … because the only way you’re killing a goddamned prehistoric dinosaur fish from hell is by shooting it (no joke).
Now the BOTTOM picture clearly contains only ONE child old enough to have gone through a hunters safety course … and not a single gun that is used for anything other than killing other human beings, and this I have a serious problem with. Guns that are intended ONLY for killing humans (the AR and AK series rifles, which are shown) with CHILDREN is a fucking problem.
Now, if they were hunting rifles in the bottom picture - you know, guns that are meant solely for the procurement of food - then I wouldn’t have an issue outside of the questionable ages of the children shown.
Really huge red flag on the bottom pic is the fact two of the kids clearly have their fingers ON THE TRIGGERS.
Its called trigger discipline. I’ve never been to any gun safety classes and I know that much.
Fingers on the tiggers……THATS MY TIGGER! #TIGGERS #TUMBLRWARRIOR
Rule 1: Never point a gun at anything unless you intend to kill it.
Rule 2: Every gun is loaded. Even when they aren’t.
Rule 3: Don’t put your finger on the trigger unless you are ready to shoot.
I have a problem with the three on the bottom because they have hteir fingers on the triggers and I have a problem with the middle and right child on the top because he is pointing it at the right child who also has his finger on the trigger. The only one who is actually doing it right is the top left.
(via rosexknight)
[video]
And thus, Sonichu was conceived.
Oh my….
Well… at least Sonic looks like he enjoyed it.
Pikachu looks ready to go again. Maybe sonics was too fast.
(via pembrokewkorgi)
[video]
If a catastrophe caused the Internet to crash, there are 7 people in the world who have keycards that can reboot the system when all 7 keys are used together. Source
It’s getting to the point where technology is indistinguishable from magic.
“Oh, no, the MASSIVE INTANGIBLE LIBRARY OF INFORMATION which allows humans all over the planet to communicate and share information has ceased functioning! Call upon the seven sages whom hold the artifacts which will repair it!”Dude its even better than that, they have to journey to a certain location in america to combine their codes into the Master Code which can revive the internet.
did fucking hideo kojima design this system
…with your powers combined, I am Captain Internet!
The sages must bring the keys to the temple to reopen all the knowledge of the world.
(via mx-bones-deactivated20160831)
Hey, this post may contain sexually explicit content, so we’ve hidden it from public view.
A rarely witnessed helicopter mating ritual.
Until 1977, scientists were uncertain of how helicopters reproduced. Some theorized that because mating had never been recorded and helicopters lack visible genitalia, that they were actually a phase in the development of another species that had been miscategorized. The “Navy” helicopters depicted above are two seaters, capable of carrying two Naval crewmen, usually a pilot (Naval Aviator) and a subordinate (Seaman or Seaman First Class).
This 1978 photograph by Larry Nork changed the way we see helicopters forever. In the image, two helicopters can clearly be seen in precoital contact or “Foreplay” which Nork described as a brief precursor to the actual mating, or “Aftplay” in which the male Navy helicopter turned and the deposited his Seaman into the female’s cockpit. The seaman then develops into a Naval Aviator and is soon capable of piloting a newborn helicopter.
For more on helicopter nursing and juvenile phases, click here.
This photo is actually from a series that Nork produced, entitled “From Conception to Conflict: A Year In The Life Of Wild Rotors”. In it, he detailed the vicious fighting between the young in a ‘copter nest, and documented the way that it would often cause collateral damage among neighbouring species of animal, and indeed among human populations too. Until Nork’s groundbreaking series, there had been no actual evidence of attacks on humans by helicopters, but Nork provided us with the proof were needed to starting hunting them down. We honor Larry Nork, and hope that his soul found more peace than his body did after being caught by the mother helicopter.Whale-Summoner. We meet again.
You’re completely wrong as usual. Nork was a Helicopter enthusiast and lover of the species. His documentation was unbiased and to claim it for your disgusting side of this argument is ignorant and offensive. Let’s look at the real Larry Nork, shall we?
- Nork was born in 1939 on Halloween.
- He was among the first to ride in a gyrocopter, an event that influenced him until his death.
- That death was not at the hands of a mother chopper but a jet engine on a Concorde. The helicopter present merely pushed him.
- Nork himself killed over 30,000 helicopters in order to mount and photograph them for his book, Helicopters of America. The Nork museum in Kentucky still has almost 17,000 of his choppers.
- Nork, as some readers know, had a sexual helicopter fetish and couldn’t maintain an erection without at least one functioning rotor blade present. He stated that all his children were conceived in the presence of a Boeing CH-47 Chinook.
- His children were named after HLHs, including Tarhe, Skycrane and Yakovlev.
- Yakovlev Nork is himself a helicopter pilot.
- Larry Nork is the only known human to have caught a moving rotor blade with his teeth, losing only 21 of them in the process.
- He could himself rotate at 560 revolutions per minute. His dizzy-barf was notoriously far flung.
- “Nork” is Australian for Boob.
But he never advocated actively hunting or culling choppers, nor did his research show any collateral damage from the ‘playing’
of young helicopters within the nest. That research was done by Augustus A. Aeronard and is well known to be forged by the hunting industrial complex.Rekt
I thought they traveled in packs and only the alpha mates.
