this animal crossing shit is crazy i stopped playing for 40 days and nights then i come back to find out my villagers have started drinking and committing adultery. theres this weird gold cow for this event too. dumb. broke my switch in half
(via stemmmm)
can’t believe i dressed up for this
(via thatneoncrisis)
pls don’t let this flop
(via rockboci)
(via bloodsbane)
this is probably my favorite disney related criticism ever
Defunctland is such a good youtube channel. The showrunner has the remarkable ability to make you care about obscure, random theme park attractions you have never heard of and his storytelling is top notch. It’s a very comfy YouTube channel to put on in the background when you’re working on something else.
That and he casually drops one liners like this and “a POWERFUL rat…named Charles Entertainment Cheese.”
(via demilypyro)
[video]
she SEEMS lawful evil if you take her at face value because she presents herself as emotionless and rational despite the fact she Definitely Is Not
this is not a lawful character
Glados is a chaotic evil character bound by multiple geass (the personality orbs) that force her to be lawful
Lawful Evil: Follows set rules, they may not be SOCIETY’S rules, but they are rules. If a Lawful Evil character sets up a series of sadistic traps with the Promise of Cake at the end, there WILL be cake at the end, even if it was an “impossible” test, you get through and they’ll all be like “I don’t have the cake because I really thought you’d die but hang on and I’ll make one for you, chocolate okay?” (Cave Johnson could be considered Lawful Evil)
Neutral Evil: Does what they do because it is either a) self serving, or b) because it furthers the goal of evil. An NE character will do evil because it makes them feel good, or benefits them. Often characters who start out with good intentions but fall prey to corruption fall into this category. (Wheatley is Neutral Evil).
Chaotic Evil: Does what they do for the sole purpose of spreading evil and creating as much pain and suffering as they can. This is not to say that CE characters cannot be scheming and methodical, in fact their schemes can be terrifying to behold when brought to fruition. They may OPERATE within confines of rules and lawfulness, but they have no loyalty towards those confines like a Lawful character would. (G.L.A.D.O.S. Is Chaotic Evil)
(via rockboci)
Full offense but sometimes fandom just totally make up the characterization of a character and then complain when that isn’t canon
(via rockboci)
people will see gross ships where the woman fixes the bad abusive boy or w/e and say “oh just like Beauty and the Beast” but y’all fail to realize Belle didn’t fix Beast. She’s not sitting there screaming about how “I know there’s good in you!!!!!!!” after he does something horrible. She’s not making it her goal to change him. Beast changes because he actively wants to become a better man. Belle is just existing around him and he’s like “hmm I wanna do something nice for her. I wanna learn how to read, and relearn how to eat properly so I don’t gross her out, and wear clothes properly instead of just ripped capes,” like he’s actually trying to be better, which is why the story works. Kyle Ron is not that. Edwin Cullen is not that. They’ll never have what The Prince has babes I’m sorry.
people keep thinking they’re writing the Beast as their love interest, when they’re actually writing a horrible, awful AU of the story where Belle leaves the Beast’s corpse rotting on the rooftop, and cheerfully marries Gaston
If the Love Interest Character has not taken initiative to improve themselves as a person by the end of the story, then the story is not using this plot arc. Paraphrasing another comment I’ve seen about this general topic, the Beast turning human at the end was not Belle’s reward for sticking with an asshole long enough to ‘fix’ him - it was his reward for pushing himself through personal growth and no longer being an asshole.
Belle didn’t love him in spite of his anger issues and violent outbursts. He, and the curse was quite explicit about this, earned her love by fixing his shitty personality. The only reason he had a chance after he scared her off with his destructive tantrum was because he had gotten injured protecting her from the wolves and her conscious and humanity wouldn’t let her leave him to possibly die. If he hadn’t been hurt, she’d have gone. She almost did anyway.
He realized that a temper isn’t an excuse for cruelty after Belle showed a bit of her own temper, then gently thanked him for saving her, since she has enough self control to chill out when the argument is done and isn’t too proud to give credit where it’s due.
He respected her for helping him and not backing down (I’m convinced respect is what he “never felt… about anyone”, not love. Not yet). He found being kind has a dopamine kick that aggression just doesn’t provide (library). She doesn’t look down on him for being illiterate, which he was embarrassed about, and started teaching him because by that point they had become friends. He probably would have let her go then if she’d asked, and been spared the broken heart by letting her go after he’d fallen completely.
Remember, folks, BATB takes place over several months. It starts early Autumn; she changes places with her father in later autumn, leaves the first time in winter— probably not that late in the season since the lake wasn’t completely frozen— and returns home when the thaw is setting in (no snow during the mob scene).
(via bloodsbane)
[video]
