Silver Tongue

Jan 09

nonbinary-safe-haven:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

I call this photo set Famous People Giving Trans/NB People Their Love and Support

If you have anything to add to this then please do!!❤️ -Mod Lee

(via newbarrk)

johnegbertfromtv:

zennistrad:

ink-quill-coffee:

buggerygrips:

honestly, out of all the games that might have patch notes reading “fixed a Geneva convention violation”, Stardew Valley was not one I expected.

image
image

Lol?!?

This far from the first game to do so. This specific Geneva Conventions violation is so common in video games the Red Cross itself has had to tell the industry to knock it off.

My favorite part of it all is that it makes “Neopets violated the Geneva Conventions in the early 2000s” a completely true sentence.

image

(via newbarrk)

[video]

[video]

one week until my appointment!

sercauthrienismywife:

Stop saying the dwarves of Khazad Dum ‘dug too greedily and too deep’ DWARVES DIG. IT’S WHAT THEY DO. I did’t see any of you popping over to let Durin VI know that he’s on top of a Balrog, how was anyone supposed to know! Saying it was ‘too deep’ or ‘too greedy’ is just Sindar propaganda, as if yall weren’t super content to sit pretty and huff weed in Menegroth while everyone else did the heavy lifting. Maybe if you’d done ANYTHING during the first age there wouldn’t BE a balrog under there in the fIRST PLACE!!! EVER THINK OF THAT? CELEBORN?

(Source: lesbiansforboromir, via bloodsbane)

[video]

smuganimebitch:

smuganimebitch:

so someone just said they’re “really interested in history” how careful do you have to be?

 “i just think history is interesting in general! i’m not interested in any specific part of it”: this person is most likely safe. never drop your guard though

“i’m interested in this specific subject or time period in history. (ex. ancient egypt,  the golden age of piracy, the history of the printing press”: still probably safe. be on the lookout for certain risky historical subjects. you should know them you see them 

“i’m really into WW2 history”: this is the caution zone, there’s plenty of valid reasons to be into WW2, but if they start talking about how Operation Sealion totally could have succeeded, it’s time to abort

 “i’m specifically into roman history, the crusades, prussian military history, and WW2”: danger! do NOT talk about history with this person. in fact, do not talk to this person at all. you will regret it, you do not want to know what they think of the treaty of versailles or why germany lost the first world war

this post has inspired three different responses

1) people who lack any reading comprehension skills whatsoever and seem to think i’m saying “being into history makes you bad” 

2) history students/historians saying some variation of “tbh this is true”

3) the kind of people my last point was specifying calling me slurs

(via stemmmm)

[video]