when male academics constantly refer to men by their surnames and women by their first names
like you’d never go to a lecture expecting shakespeare to be referred to as “william” but it’s not at all uncommon to sit through an entire lecture in which jane austen is referred to constantly as “jane”
it’s such a petty thing but it just really rubs me the wrong way, like it has a real suggestion of respect and admiration/lack thereof
kind of like how during the 2016 election everything was Trump vs Hillary
in todays DND session, my tabaxi, leona love, used the lawful good character to score some catnip from herbalists who dont sell to tabaxi. Unfortunately, the herbalist was a succubus that leonas rivals with so when i took a deep whiff of the bag, leona was met with stinging nettles up her nose
I love how it’s “The Strange Case of Doctor Jekyll and MISTER Hyde” as in, yeah, they are basically two sides of the same person but only ONE has a doctorate
#unless your bitch ass second personality helped you write that thesis it is your fucking doctorate
Anonymous asked: Factually inaccurate. The bread for the hot dog is cut vertically while the sub's bread is cut horizontally. You also cut the meat into smaller pieces for subs, while you leave the hot dog itself intact. If you cut the hot dog into pieces and put it into a horizontally sliced bun it would be a sandwich, but I feel that the way the hot dog is served is too differently than a conventional sandwich to be called one.
By this logic a sandwich can be a sandwich or not depending on its contents?
If i put a full hotdog in between two slices of white bread and eat it as such, is that a sandwich or a hot dog?
If i cut a hot dog down the middle all the way and put the two halves in a hot dog bun, is it still a hotdog despite the dog itself not being intact?
