Silver Tongue

Jul 16

sindraws:
“ Commission for Hgorski6. His Lopunny, Omar, wearing a totally normal hoodie. Move along.
”

sindraws:

Commission for Hgorski6. His Lopunny, Omar, wearing a totally normal hoodie. Move along.

(via adurot)

kelssiel:

cullenfucked:

ree-duh:

1953swan:

man imagine getting an anal exam from carlisle. i know the mans a good doctor but his fingers are chilly….

Would he like??? Boil his fingers before hand???

image

moodboard for carlisle boiling his hands to put in your ass

i’m gonna fucking murder every last one of you and the lord will not punish me for it

(via )

stevetwisp:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

(via dan-mcneely-deactivated20210328)

tddkart:

When the “Vacation Juice” hits..

(via demilypyro)

theadventuresofhamtaro:

hamhampatchi:

noppokun:

image

that’s actually a hamster Hamtaro was based off of!

The Man, The Legend

@demon-space-boi

(via newbarrk)

dizzyscientist:

yeah i have ocs that have long and complicated stories, no i can’t put those stories into words and make them comprehensible. we exist

(via newbarrk)

(via demilypyro)

peachdoxie:

jayalaw:

peachdoxie:

Spiderverse Miles Morales is high int low wis bc he was able to get 0/100 on a true/false quiz which means he knew all the answers correctly but didn’t think through the fact that getting a 0 would be suspicious

Also he made up a month to apparently make it more convincing

This is valid evidence I overlooked thank you for your contribution

Miles “understands the theory behind a multiverse tunnel machine” morales is the same miles morales as miles “whose morales” morales

(via newbarrk)

[video]

willow-wanderings:

lyricwritesprose:

bubonickitten:

do you think we as a society can finally acknowledge that “this thing didn’t have a name until recently” doesn’t necessarily mean “this thing did not exist until recently” or (worse) “this thing doesn’t exist at all”

Let’s also agree that “this thing did not have an English name until recently,” does not necessarily mean it was nameless.

And while we’re at it how about we add “You don’t get to systematically destroy the evidence for this thing and then claim that because there’s no evidence, the thing doesn’t exist and has never existed.”

(via newbarrk)