The best part of ‘me, an intellectual’ is that the grammatically correct pronoun would be ‘I’.
you: me, an intellectual
me, an intellectual: I, an intellectual
hi where the fuck do you think that fragment is getting nominative case. listen to me. subjects of transitive verbs in nom-acc languages get nominative case by agreeing with a tense node. are you listening. fragments are accusative in english because that’s the default case when there’s no case-assigning node. meet me in the pit behind the denny’s and i will explain this to you. bring a whiteboard
you: The best part of ‘me, an intellectual’ is that the grammatically correct pronoun would be ‘I’.
kirby, a linguist:
meet me in the pit behind the denny’s and i will explain this to you. bring a whiteboard
maybe my favorite post to ever happen
“hi where the fuck do you think that fragment is getting nominative case”
Does kirby-ebooks know that literally everything they said here is Iconic?
honestly… play undertale if you haven’t yet. this isn’t even a “fuck cringe culture” thing because i def understand being put off by the fandom but it’s a genuinely well made, beautiful, emotional game about love and hope and as sappy as it is to say that it’s such a good experience that genuinely changed me as a person. it’s usually five dollars on steam because of how often there are sales and it’s honestly the best five dollars i’ve ever spent
Blogging this tweet because this explains SO MUCH about the mindset of pretty much all the folks I’ve known who’re against single-payer, it’s not even funny…
This….
This never occurred to me. Not once. That Americans are against Health Care because they think it actually costs tens of thousands of dollars for a broken arm, hundreds of thousands for a complicated birth, millions for cancer treatment.
Because they’ve never known anything different. The idea that a broken arm is only a couple hundred bucks; a complicated birth a couple thousand; cancer treatment only tens of thousands; all easily covered by existing tax structures.
This explains a lot. And it’s a good example of what I was talking about in my post on scarcity being used to prop up ableism – always question the idea that a resource is genuinely scarce. Even if it seems obvious that it is, quite often that’s the result of careful manipulation and misconceptions that you’re not even aware of.
And never think you’re too smart to be fooled by that kind of thing, it doesn’t work like that. Similarly, don’t think people who are fooled by something are stupid. Nobody can have all the information about everything, and nobody has the time and energy to investigate and put together conscious conclusions about every piece of information they’re given. It doesn’t take being stupid, or even just gullible, to believe something like this.
I currently live in a country without free medical care and still, it’s enormously cheap compared to the USA. An American expat wrote a piece for our English language paper about how she paid more for parking at the hospital than giving birth to her baby that’s pretty interesting:
always question the idea that a resource is genuinely scarce
The funny part is if you cut the military budget by half and spread it to other expenses, we wouldn’t have any problems getting that extra money.
Military expense is the greatest piece in the pie chart.
This is partially true, but honestly, a lot of the people who are against universal healthcare would still be against universal healthcare even if they knew it wouldn’t cost as much as they think because they’re going to be against anything that uses their tax money to help other people, especially those who are marginalized or at a greater disadvantage than they are. They’re racist and classist and ageist and ableist so they’re always going to assume that the people who need things like welfare and universal healthcare are lazy, or stupid, and completely undeserving of the necessities one needs to live if they can’t (in their minds won’t) work for.
I didn’t understand how Americans didn’t have free health care until I saw what they charged you for it.
From now on I will only accept love triangles if they end in:
Polyamory
The main character rejecting both love interests and staying single
The two love interests giving up on the main character because how hard is it to make a damn choice?
4. The two love interests realizing they love each other more than the main character and the main character getting together with someone that wasn’t even part of the triangle proper.
5. All three characters realizing they’re better as friends and going go kart racing
