I follow the “leave nothing but footprints take nothing but photos” rule of state/national parks yeah because conservation. But also because when I was 11 i read a short story about a girl who went to a museum and stole a bandage flake off a mummy on display with the mentality of “im just one person one piece won’t be missed” then at night she was visited by the mummy and it plucked a single hair from her head and then the next night a different mummy took another hair and she realized that there were only so many pieces to her before there would be nothing left and that story was forever wedged in my brain. Anyways leave cool rocks where you find them or the mummies will get you
is this real? / i thought pro wrestling was fake? wrestling is ‘fake’ in that the fights are choreographed and the winner is predetermined, but the physicality is very real. there’s no way to 'fake’ getting whipped with a metal chain so hard it leaves welts.
why ARE they chained? this is a specialty fight called a 'dog collar match’ where both participants are, you guessed it, fitted with dog collars which are then chained together.
is this legal? / how can this be allowed? why wouldn’t it be? they’re both consenting adults who planned and agreed to it.
but they could be seriously hurt! they know, and they accept the risk. pro wrestlers are well aware of the injuries possible in their line of work, and they do it anyway because they’re crazy people.
IS there aftercare? of a sort, yeah - there’s a medical team on hand to patch everyone up, and lots of coworkers backstage to give them a 'job well done!’
why are they wearing thigh highs? they’re kneepads/shin guards for protection. looking like sexy thigh highs is just a bonus side effect!
ok, but why’s that guy in a shiny speedo? personal preference. wrestlers can design their own outfits and some prefer full coverage long tights, while others wear less to show off the gams.
Nah mate two half-naked muscular men chained together by their dog collars whipping the shit out of each other with chains in a ritualised power struggle with a predetermined dominator and submitter of the interaction in a public ring is wholesome family entertainment
Image Description: A black and white photograph of two marchers on a street, lined with observers. One carries a sign that reads, “A gay landlord is still a landlord,” interspersed with stars. End ID.
Very interesting how different this hits 50 years on. In its original context, the sign was presumably in the vein of “gay people are people too”, part of the very necessary groundwork that pride was built upon.
However, through a modern lens, it’s an effective statement against rainbow capitalism; “just because your landlord/boss/cop/soldier is gay/female/black/etc doesn’t mean they aren’t still inherently a bastard”. This may be the original intent behind the sign, but the former seems more likely in the relatively early stages of the campaign for American LGBT rights
honey this was an anti landlord statement, in 1977 and today. the roots of this community are far more radical than you’re giving credit
