Silver Tongue

Dec 10

moonpaw:
“ “ i, too, love davejat
”
they are in the popular webcomic, homstucj
”

moonpaw:

i, too, love davejat

they are in the popular webcomic, homstucj

moonpaw:
“ moonpaw:
“taakos tentacle fetish goes a bit farther
”
where the fuck else are furries supposed to get their dicks? walgreens? mind your own business
”

moonpaw:

moonpaw:

taakos tentacle fetish goes a bit farther 

image

where the fuck else are furries supposed to get their dicks? walgreens? mind your own business

(via moonpaw)

zelda-guru-momi:

gaystropods:

if you observe the elves in rudolph the red nosed raindeer, you’ll notice this:

image

the elf men have very large noses, and are all bald, while the elf women have smaller noses and wavy blonde hair.

now. we already know hermey the elf is a twink. however i’d like to offer up a second piece of information:

image

hermey, though a man, exhibits a small nose and wavy blonde hair. did you guess it yet?

hermey is trans

TBH I’m just glad he lives in a trans friendly society in which the only reason people thought he was odd was because he wanted to be a dentist.

(via bloodsbane)

yourplayersaidwhat:

Context: Our party was fighting a group of zombies in a monster-infested town. We had defeated two out of the three, and the last one was standing just within the doorway of a small shack.

Wizard OOC: Alright, I’m gonna run forwards and hit the zombie with my quarterstaff!

DM: Alright, roll.

Wizard OOC: …I got a 1.

DM: You run forwards with your staff, attempting to hit the zombie with blunt force, but you misjudge the height of the doorway and your staff gets lodged within the soft wood.

Ranger: *rolls eyes* Wow, great job.

Fighter OOC: Alright, then I’m gonna run forwards and slash at the zombie with my sword. He doesn’t have many hit points left, right?

DM: Nope.

*a long period of silence passes*

Fighter OOC: …I got a 1 too.

*uproarious laughter*

DM: Alright, so you run forwards and, same as the wizard, your sword gets caught deep in the doorframe. Both of you are completely stuck where you’re standing and the zombie is just staring at you now, caught up in a wave of second-hand-embarrassment. It stands there for a long while before it disappears into the house. A second later you hear the backdoor open and you see a cloud of dust floating upwards in the wind. The zombie literally killed itself you guys. The zombie killed itself because of your incompetence. Great job. 10/10.

Ranger: Yay, we did it!

(via yourplayersaidwhat)

[video]

[video]

doughgoong:

writing-prompt-s:

Describe the most beautiful person you’ve ever seen, in three words.

just like bart

(via dies-first)

dustyhaulier:

furippupauplus:

dustyhaulier:

i was having thoughts this morning about naruto and how. early days naruto was so different from the other loud spiky ‘underdog’ shounen heroes we get these days

a lot of underdog characters in current shounen manga that ive been reading are underdogs because they are timid or socially awkward or clumsy somehow (haikyuu, yowapeda, that baseball anime, bnha)

but naruto was genuinely obnoxious. he was gross and rude and clingy. he was loud and disruptive and ruined things.

he was affection starved and had little positive socialisation. he was from an extremely tough background with very very few good role models. he was grubby and wasnt fed well at home. he didnt quite know how to tone himself down, in fact hed never had a reason to try–hed do anything for attention, even negative attention. he was just like so many kids ive known, that i knew in school myself, that i see now as an adult.

that was such a great layer of realness. no matter how much i might enjoy other similar ‘underdog’ characters, i dont think ive ever seen another one come close to that level of nuance

Bart Simpson?

bart simpson, the greatest shounen anime character of our time

(via dies-first)

vaspider:

glitterarygetsit:

amuseoffyre:

morgauseoforkney:

nancybirch:

When I die I want to be buried with grave goods that make future archaeologists think I was of much higher status than I actually was so that my grave will be referred to as a princely burial and I’ll be remembered by some cool name like “The Colchester Barrow Princess” (I’ve decided that I will be buried in a highly visible barrow, possibly with a ship) and the National Trust will erect a small museum about me filled with entirely incorrect but cool sounding archaeological assumptions

Be buried literally holding a sword and axe and then sit back and watch the endless ‘powerful warrior queen v. just usual valuable grave goods indicating a high status individual’ debate from the afterlife.

I want a spring-loaded casket and non-degrading glitter. I will be remembered as “that *£^$% thing that killed Professor Hannover”

As an archaelogist I completely support this.

“Characteristic of 21st century society is the sharp delineation between the funerary practices of more conservative, traditionalist groups and the generally younger and more creative subcultures. While those who identified as more conservative nevertheless frequently included personal items in their grave goods, the individuality of their burials pales in comparison with the eccentricity and extravagance of the neoteric groups.  Funerary archaeologists have been hard pressed to find commonalities between these individualistic burials. It is likely that members of these subgroups competed to include the most unique ritual items amongst the grave goods of the deceased.

One example from Colchester could be read as a highly detailed homage to the seventh-century Taplow boat burial. Dendrochronology of the vessel dates the burial to the mid- to late-21st century. The opulence of the burial is at odds with what we know of contemporary social structure. As such, it is likely that the deceased or their family wished to indicate a strong connection to the area by aligning their identity with the Anglo-Saxon royal history of the region.

Another example, this one from Milton Keynes, included a bewildering array of items. Archaeologists uncovered a Tudor coin, a Whitney Houston CD, and a mobile phone inscribed “Bite me, historians”. Taken together, these grave goods indicate a disdain for archaeological research and the reconstruction of identity using material culture. It is possible that members of this subgroup sought to use creative anachronism to conceal the date of their death. Some researchers have argued that individuals buried under similar circumstances believed that this knowledge could be used for identity fraud or necromancy.

There has been some research done into the psychological trauma associated with excavating human remains. Most of this research has focused on the emotional challenges of excavating mass graves resulting from genocide or plague, with the occasional footnote regarding individual burials (such as the excavation of a lead coffin in Whitechapel which produced a fountain of liquefied Roman remains when the air seal was pierced). It is my view, however, that further research in this field is urgently needed following the sad and horrifying events of the recent excavations on Orkney. I am sure I do not need to go into further detail about the dig that shook our discipline to the core, and will refrain from doing so. For those of a gruesome persuasion, the full excavation report has been lodged with the ADS. Field archaeologists are advised to wear protective clothing including goggles and, where possible, shields when excavating graves of this period.

Professor Hannover is sincerely missed and a monograph of papers in her honour is scheduled for publication next year.”

… it got better.

(via chess-and-snickers-deactivated2)

[video]