For the purposes of this experiment, let’s assume taako was wearing a hat when the IPRE first left their homeworld
every time they are reset when they leave a plane, they are rebuilt exactly as they were when they left their original world. We can assume this means their clothes are reset as well, because there’s no way those red robes are lasting that long otherwise. It is also started that they are capable of bringing objects and lower lifeforms with them on the starblaster.
so, is it then feasible that Taako could say, take his hat off and leave it in his room on the starblaster, and then be rebuilt by the light of creation, wearing a replica of that same exact hat.
what i’m saying here is that taako found a glitch in the planes to make infinite hats and absolutely abused the hell out of it
He does it on accident the first year
After that, it’s how they keep track of how many loops they’ve been through. Good ol’ Taako’s hat count
“Wait, this is our… thirty-seventh year, right?”
“I thought we were on thirty -nine by now?”
“… I’ll go count Taakos hats
“My name’s Taako and this is my walkthrough for the Starblaster infinite hats glitch…”
I think the “I hate kids” sentiment grew out of: “I hate the pressure placed upon me as a woman to procreate heterosexually” but instead of thinking through this and realizing that this pressure is constructed by the patriarchy to oppress women and that the children themselves in this equation have done nothing wrong, you all turn your anger on to children because you can’t seem to place that it’s not really them that you are frustrated with and hate in the first place, but an oppressive system larger than you as an individual.
There are A LOT of evil responses to this post I do not have the energy to address all of them so I’ll just leave this here
What stops rich people from donating to charity as often as everyone else?
Especially like rich doctors who know a patient can’t afford treatment or something…why?
I don’t understand it at all. Someone please explain or add because this is bothering me and I don’t want a generic answer like “rich people are more greedy”. There must be something more to it.
“But why? Lower-income Americans are presumably no more intrinsically generous (or “prosocial,” as the sociologists say) than anyone else. However, some experts have speculated that the wealthy may be less generous—that the personal drive to accumulate wealth may be inconsistent with the idea of communal support.”
So from what I’ve read this seems to be pretty much a result of capitalism. Which is kinda what I expected.
It’s because they don’t become wealthy by giving away their money. They learn habits of hoarding, and the farther they move into wealth, the less they remember the discrepancy between wealth and poverty. $50 is nothing for a truly wealthy person, but it is everything to the poor. However, the farther they come into wealth, the less that ratio is remembered. More and more, the hoarding habits take over, and are justified by psychology, meaning that the “Get a job and do as I have done” mentality takes over.
This is sometimes not true. Bill Gates almost single handedly funds AIDS research and aid. He has so much money it doesn’t matter if he gives half of it away, because he’ll never be able to spend it all anyway.
