Silver Tongue

Apr 21

ramblingpilgrim:
“Tony Hawk is probably the best evidence that people would never recognize Clark Kent as Superman in real life.
”

ramblingpilgrim:

Tony Hawk is probably the best evidence that people would never recognize Clark Kent as Superman in real life.

(via rosexknight)

froggy-nebula:

froggy-nebula:

but if jade was awake on prospit before the game even started and there are those quest slabs in the center of each moon then technically a speedrun was possible and in some absolutely insane timeline she ascended at like age eight before the earth even blew up

image

I think her waking self would need to be dead first for it to work

(via aeritus)

mylordshesacactus:

beatrice-otter:

strongwomenunited:

badwolfkaily:

image

This.

I don’t know about others but the only reason I put both is so that whichever someone clicks on, they will find my fic. So if there is supposed to be rules, I guarantee you that no writer knows these ones. We can barely get people to comment, you think we’re going to specifically choose & or / ? Hell no.

I’ve been in fandom for twenty years, and “/” means romance and “&” means no romance was literally one of the first things I learned. It dates back to Star Trek fanfiction of the 70s. I’m boggled by the fact that anyone who’s been reading fic on AO3 for more than like five minutes wouldn’t know that, and I’m curious as to what fanfic community you come out of.

I don’t think that tagging with both is actually going to get your fic in front of more readers. People looking for romance often exclude the “&” tag if there are too many gen fics tagged with both. People looking for gen often exclude the “/” tag if there are too many fics with both. So rather than putting your fic in front of twice the people, you are in fact more likely to get your target audience ignoring your fic because it has a tag they don’t want.

Also, by overtagging you are more likely to annoy potential readers away from your fic than entice them. A fic tagged both & and / better have both romance and a ton of platonic interaction between the two characters, like a slow burn romance friends-to-lovers arc. If it isn’t, I’m going to be very unhappy because the author lied to me with the tags to try and trick me into reading a fic with deceptive advertising.

When I’m in a fandom and see tagging where some of the tags don’t really apply and are just there to get it in front of more eyes, I’m going to assume one of two things. Either the author is a newb who doesn’t know anything, or the author is purposefully spamming the tags because they don’t care about lying to their potential audience and think that “spray and pray” is an effective tactic. In the first case, their writing probably will not be very good, so why bother reading their fic. In the second case, the fact that I can’t trust the tags to be accurate means I’m not going to read it to see if it’s interesting even if it has a tag I like. Chances are, that tag isn’t actually in the fic anyway, and even if it is, by spam-tagging the author is making the archive harder to use for everybody. Why would I reward bad behavior with attention? No. Far better to mute the author and move on.

More to the point–and no, I will never stop harping on this, because we have GOT to stop leaving our strongest points in the drawer–it doesn’t matter if you heard of this convention before joining AO3 or not, because it’s in AO3’s tagging FAQ.

image

[id: the “How do I tag a romantic or platonic relationship?” section of the tagging FAQ here.]

“But Jo,” you may argue, because you’re wrong. “There’s no way to find that without digging through site FAQ menus, and that’s really inaccessible!”

sure

except

that when you go to post a new fic, and you go to put in those relationship tags, you see this

image

[id: the Relationships field]

and that tooltip, the one THERE TO EXPLAIN HOW THE FIELD WORKS, links to the Relationships segment of the tag FAQ, which explicitly lays this shit out.

I don’t care if you don’t know fandom history. I don’t care if you’ve never heard a goddamn word about the spirk shippers. I don’t care if you’ve never been exposed to fandom culture in your life. It is, frankly, not fair to expect those things of everyone.

What is entirely fair to expect is that you will READ THE INSTRUCTIONS PRINTED NEXT TO THE FUCKING BOX, actually. Forget fandom conventions. It genuinely doesn’t matter whether you agree with or respect fandom conventions. This is a site policy. This is explicitly how tagging on AO3, specifically, works.

did people forget that the “slash” in “slashfiction” refers to the /

(via newbarrk)

makaiwars:

sandmandaddy69:

image
image

(via rockboci)

criticallyacclaimedstranger:

letthedalekssaycuck:

soundsof71:

amaskdescribingamask-deactivate:

This is more punk than the whole of punk history.

I’ll tell you what’s ferocious. Freddie’s comeback to Sid calling him “Freddie Platinum” when they were recording down the hall from each other at London’s Wessex Studios (Queen for News of the World, Pistols for Bollocks).

Sid Vicious made the mistake one day of bursting into Queen’s control room and antagonizing their frontman. “Have you succeeded in bringing ballet to the masses, then?” he sneered. “Oh, yes, Simon Ferocious,” Mercury replied. “We’re trying our best, dear.” 

Then, according to Queen biographer Daniel Nester, Freddie rose from his chair and began to playfully flick the safety pins displayed on the front of Sid’s leather jacket. “Tell me,” he asked, “did you arrange these pins just so?” When Sid stepped forward in an attempt to intimidate Freddie, the singer simply pushed him backwards and inquired, “What are you going to do about it?” Sid immediately backed down. [x]

Freddie Mercury may very well have had the biggest dick energy of anyone who ever lived

Tags from @thirddeadlysin

image

(via demilypyro)

thenewborndeity:

chongoblog:

Brief Twitter Update!

So today was the day that they got rid of legacy checkmarks on Twitter, giving people a valid reason to block checkmarks on sight.

But

image

It turns out

image

So basically it appears that Elon is paying to give celebrities this feature (possibly against their will?).

Incredibly funny.

OH MY GOD HES SO SO UPSET THAT CELEBS ARENT PAYING AND IT MAKES HIS FEATURE LOOK STUPID

(via nofacednerd)

[video]

everwizard:

abysstar-nonsense:

abysstar-nonsense:

everwizard:

My anthropologist partner dislikes the 1.20 update because it refers to pieces of pottery as “shards” rather than the correct term, “sherds”

I like how there’s just this small group of people being a “little” upset about the shard and sherd thing. I’m reblogging every single one of them

Fyi if you don’t already know, shard is broken pieces of glass and sherd is broken pieces of ceramic

Good News

image
image

Anthropology win.

(via newbarrk)

tchaikovskaya:

tchaikovskaya:

image
image

(via rockboci)

Apr 20

cargopantsman:

fxlthyangxl:

image
image

(via rockboci)