chefpyro:

tentativenewtype:

requiemjesta:

fuckfacemcgillicuddy:

swagdeddy:

i would literally never play this game again if that happened to me

What the fuck just happened?

A slaughter.

The strategy is called FEAR. Basically, the Ratata has a focus Sash on, so when the enemy hits the level 1 Ratata, it’ll survive with one HP left. The Ratata uses Endeavor on that turn, which brings the opponent’s HP to 1 too. Unless the enemy also has a Speed ignoring move, Ratata’s quick attack will go first, chipping that last HP off. FEAR is generally understood as Focus sash Endeavor, quick Attack Ratata, but could also be known by Fucking Evil Attack Ratata.

image

chefpyro:

badcowboy69:

cacomagen:

fallout4pics:

gg

Oh.my.God.

Dayummmm

I haven’t found the worst ‘epic’ to be applicable to anything in a long time.

But this. This is it.

image
dark david byrne

sympolite:

  • this IS my beautiful house
  • this IS my beautiful wife
  • different than it was before
When someone wants to test the limits of your friendship:

oathkeeper-of-tarth:

I’ll never forget the look on that Nephrite’s face when you pulled her out of the cockpit!

Pearl clearly put a whole bunch of points into the vehicles skill so now she can drive, pilot, fly, and operate (and hijack and reverse engineer!) anything. It’s one of my favourite things.

frozenmusings:

sauntering-vaguely-downwards:

just-shower-thoughts:

Winter is really going to separate the Pokémon Masters from the Pokémon Trainers

Someone obviously doesn’t live in a place where summer is regularly +110°

I can’t wait to go Pokemon hunting in -45°C for the next 6 months.

pokemon hunting in winter is better than pokemon hunting in summer because I’m all for wearing 87 layers of cloths but I could be naked in the summer and still be super hot.

maxandthespidersfrommars:

sandandglass:

The Daily Show, August 18, 2016

Jordan Klepper gets to know Trump supporters

It’s like shooting fish in a barrel

blooniverse:
“ amethirstyperidrunk:
“ thought i’d practice some boarding.
”
Reblogging from my side blog.
”

blooniverse:

amethirstyperidrunk:

thought i’d practice some boarding.

Reblogging from my side blog.

bace-jeleren:
“ whowasphoone:
“ maxiesatanofficial:
“ yiffmaster:
“ mapsontheweb:
“ Thomas Jefferson’s proposed division of western U.S. territory into states, ca. 1784.
”
motherfucker thought he could slip a state named after himself in there
”
I...

bace-jeleren:

whowasphoone:

maxiesatanofficial:

yiffmaster:

mapsontheweb:

Thomas Jefferson’s proposed division of western U.S. territory into states, ca. 1784.

motherfucker thought he could slip a state named after himself in there

I mean in fairness he also gave his predecessors one each

fucking “metropotamia” though? “equitasia?” what a fucking nerd

isnt equitasia where the my little ponies live

I can’t believe Thomas Jefferson was the first brony

fyeahcontroversialcharacters:

These tweets are part of a long thread mainly directed towards the Steven Universe fandom, but I think they’re relevant to many fandoms. I chose these two tweets in particular because they hit on a major reason for why so many characters appear on this blog: their flaws.

Now I’m not sure how many of you are writers or at least interested in writing, but for those of you who are (such as myself), you would know that well-developed characters are supposed to have flaws. Flaws allow characters to become three-dimensional, realistic beings that the audience can relate to. However, as seen on this blog many times, whenever a character does have flaws, they’re hated because of those same traits. But when a character doesn’t have flaws (or they don’t have enough flaws), then those characters are hated because they’re Mary Sues/Gary Stus, boring, etc.

Not only do flaws aid in character development, but they can also help to move the story along by providing conflict. Again, for those of you who are writers or are interested in writing, you would know that stories need some type of conflict to 1) engage the audience and 2) move the story along. One potential source of conflict can be *drum roll* character flaws! Having a character do something “problematic” or believing in something “problematic” can be the driving force behind a story. Most people would easily become bored with a story if everything was perfect 95% of the time and the build-up/conflict only occurred during the last 5%.

If you can’t handle the fact that well-developed, three-dimensional characters are flawed, if you can’t handle the fact that those flaws can be the reason for why the story exists in the first place, and if you can’t handle the fact that those flaws and the conflicts they cause are why you and other people are still engaged in the story after all this time, then perhaps you should move on to something else.