Silver Tongue
Apparently I never posted lydia or if I did, I didn’t tag it. Either way, this is lydia. She’s fantastic with a both a violin and a fiddle.

Apparently I never posted lydia or if I did, I didn’t tag it. Either way, this is lydia. She’s fantastic with a both a violin and a fiddle.

fueled-by-nightcore:
“ Michael always seems to end up being some degree of shirtless in any animated show he’s in.
”
what do you mean animated?

fueled-by-nightcore:

Michael always seems to end up being some degree of shirtless in any animated show he’s in.

what do you mean animated?

image

scuzer:

based on a conversation i had with @dickmail (love u bb), and how could i not draw it 

kilalabunnies:
“ magnetsaremiracles:
“ this is still my favourite thing EVER
”
@silver-tongues-blog
”
>:U

kilalabunnies:

magnetsaremiracles:

this is still my favourite thing EVER

@silver-tongues-blog

>:U

3,000-Year-Old Cooking Mistake Revealed

toopunktofuck:

maxiesatanofficial:

archaeologicalnews:

image

Archaeologists in Denmark have found evidence of a 3,000 year-old cooking mistake that casts some light into the everyday life of Scandinavian Bronze Age people.

Clear evidence for one of the most common mistakes in the kitchen – burning food – lay in a clay pot that was excavated in central Jutland, Denmark.

The clay vessel was found, upturned and in near mint condition, at the bottom of what was once a waste pit.

“The pot is typical for cooking vessels in this region of Denmark. It was accompanied by several other objects fitting the dating,” archaeologist Kaj F. Rasmussen from Museum Silkeborg, Denmark, told Discovery News. Read more.

[fucks up dinner and just straight-up buries the evidence] We’re Getting Ancient Pizza Tonight, Girls

one time when i was 13 i burned pudding and couldn’t get it out of the pot and i was so ashamed i buried it in the backyard so no one would know

i see we’ve changed very little as a species

one-eyed-freak:
“ ✌🐢✌
”

one-eyed-freak:

✌🐶✌

kinkstertime:
“ gotosweep:
“ shadeddaxion:
“ goomba-oasis:
“ poison-liker:
“ gotosweep:
“ new ebbits! new site!
”
this is probably my favourite comic of all time jsyk
”
can someone explain this to me?
”
Sure thing! For convenience I’ll refer to the...

kinkstertime:

gotosweep:

shadeddaxion:

goomba-oasis:

poison-liker:

gotosweep:

new ebbits! new site!

this is probably my favourite comic of all time jsyk

can someone explain this to me?

Sure thing! For convenience I’ll refer to the guy with his arms in his pockets as SG (shorter guy) and the one on the computer as TG (taller guy).

In the first panel, SG sees TG playing on the computer and is disappointed. SG puts a lot of value in the idea of “making things,” specifically “art,” and thinks TG is just wasting their time

So he asks them if they wouldn’t rather be “making something” instead of just playing games and listening to music, implying that TG isn’t doing anything worthwhile or creative with their time

But TG replies that “interpreting is generative,” meaning that even if they spend their time just doing fun stuff, the mere act of enjoying something is creating an experience and an interpretation. Talking about something, dancing to music or sharing a piece of art with your friends IS “making something,” and each of those can be worthwhile and artistic.

SG leaves, complaining he “can’t be an auteur of [interpretation].” Auteur is a movie term that refers to a filmmaker with artistic control and vision enough to be considered essentially the singular creator of the resulting work of art. Turns out, SG doesn’t just want to “make things,” he wants to make things he and others see as “important.” He wants to make art not for the sake of art, but for the sake of being recognized and praised for his art.


This comic really speaks to elitism within the artistic community, the idea that art needs to meet certain standards to be considered art. SG’s viewpoint is really traditionalist, that art need to be “approved” and validated in order to be considered “really art;” while TG recognizes that art can be as little as just talking about what you love.

TLDR: Art is for everyone, not just some sort of social “artistic elite.”

ooh i love the explanation

Rebloging for that in depth and not even a little snarky explanation. 10/10