has anyone ever finished a game of monopoly
i now know why
We had one game that lasted 5 classes in english senior year. We had a paper and we each wrote down who had what properties and how much money. so we could continue the next day. We wrote out the numbers so whoever got to keep track of the paper couldn’t cheat.
Is this a real version of the “white suburban moms arguing on facebook?” I thought that was just a myth!
there are some internet friends where eventually you start calling them by their real name and then there’s times where its like nah son your name is crispy forever
There is no biblical evidence that Jesus even knew how to parallel park. Letting him take the wheel seems a bit irresponsible.
Uh, no, you’re so wrong? Everybody knows that Jesus drove a Honda, but he didn’t like to talk about it?
From John 12:49 ‘For I do not speak of my own Accord…’
That is brilliant and this post is an example of the right way to do religious jokes are are actually funny without being preachy nor offensive.
-no chill
-pokes nose in groudon and kyogres business
-shrek impersonator
-she ratchet
-fucking destroyed my meteor that shithead
-the fuck man it wasnt my fault
-u dont own earth u domesticated condom
-built up to be the most badass god but ends up being a chump
-dies in one hit by deoxys
-dies in one hit by the person who goes on and on about how badass he is
Frollo and Quasimodo
Mother Gothel and Rapunzel
Frollo and Mother Gothel convince Quasimodo and Rapunzel that their lives are dependent on them. The two villains claim the outside world is a terrible place even though they know this is not true. They also constantly emotionally abuse their victims by implying their worthlessness and destroying their self-esteems. Quasimodo and Rapunzel sympathize with their captors and even believe their captors are protecting them and treating them with kindness. However, both captors are merely using and manipulating their victims for their own selfish purposes.
NOT:
Belle does not sympathize with the Beast when she is treated poorly. She becomes angry and leaves the castle, only returning by her own wish so that the Beast (who saves her) does not freeze to death. She does not respond nicely towards the Beast until he treats her with respect. In this situation, Belle has control and is not manipulated into feeling for the Beast, nor does the Beast treat her disrespectfully after the first night. While the Beast does have an underlying motive as to keeping Belle in his castle, he abandons this idea and sets her free to make her happy. If anything, this story is a case of Lima Syndrome where the captor starts to sympathize with the victim.
Check out this post which refocuses the purpose of Beauty and the Beast from merely (and wrongly) being about Stockholm Syndrome to it’s original purpose.
Preach it.
