Ah yes, the victim's creation of its killer. A pattern of the student surpassing its master. The paradox that proves perfection impossible. But although being a hero and being perfect are similar concepts, they are not the same... On the "'villians' were not inherently evil." part, I have to slightly disagree with you. Although we all have the potential to become good or evil when we are born, we cannot base our alignment on our potential. That is not how the world currently works...
I’m not basing it on their potential, I’m basing it on their cause vs their actions.
(I'm halfway through the third season, so try not to get ahead of that.) If you wanted to prove that Korra was indeed a villain herself, then you'd be trying to prove that all hypocrites are villains. In other words, "how can you call this good if bad comes from it?" If hypocrite=villain, then I should agree with you. But everyone is a hypocrite, and you cannot have an antagonist without a protagonist. I say a person is defined by what they stand for, not what they fall for.
I didn’t say she was a villain. I just said her actions caused most of the problems. And that the “villains” were not inherently evil.
The villain is the person who punished those who tried to do the right thing. The hero is the person who surpassed the other. Even a penny can be deemed a hero if it manages to overcome the villain. But let me also comment by saying that there is no such thing as order. Chaos is the thing that both creates order and destroys it. Enough chaos, and you destroy order. Enough order, and you only delay chaos.
Heros and Villains are but a social construct. We only see heroes and villains based on how we were raised.
Keep reading
"Every villain is a hero in their own mind" Unless that person is being a villain for the sake of being a villain. That person could also understand the evil in their actions, and eventually start begging their enemy to defeat them knowing that good must triumph over evil in the end. I already knew what you were attempting to do on that blog. I followed you because I believed we were similar, remember?
But the thing is, there is no such thing as good or evil. There is only chaos and order. Sometimes chaos is what helps the many and sometimes it’s order.
Would killing a king be okay if the king is corrupt? What if the nation goes into anarchy after the death of said king and someone goes to bring law into the kingdom once again? What if that person brings order through force and fear? Who is the villain? Who is the hero?
I should draw more butts. I might draw butts in the near future.
I followed you about three days ago because I thought we shared major similarities. Your comments on derpy's abilities to see and know the truth tipped me off. Almost everything you've said so far you can apply to me. Everything apart from the being neutral and Ianite, who I had to look up in order to understand what you meant. I'm not neutral because I usually take the losing side in order to balance things out.
Actually I was making a reference to jitters because his doctor got discorded by “the truth” which drove him to drinking, dangerous stunts and (possibly unsafe) sex. And I saw a derpy who was all about saying the truth.
I saw an opportunity and I took it.
But in reality, the world isn’t good and evil. Everything is grey. Many people who do terrible things are good in their own mind.
“Every villain is a hero in their own mind”
solarsenpai:
vrixy:
zachsgay:
l
is that a lowercase L or an uppercase i youll never know
it’s a lowercase L.
buddy did the absolute most up there
l compIeteIy agree.
Though, l think it is a bit difficuIt to teII sometimes.
You're a libra too? If you are, then my intuition must be stronger than I think.
Or it’s because I reblogged a libra post right after answering your question that might have tipped you off. I like libra. I like the scales. I like being neutral. That’s why I am team Ianite.
