this seems… strangely familiar…
Is that a brony
She predicted it
No, he’s missing the neck beard and trilby
I figured out the Doctor Who finale
The Time Lords are going to come in and give the Doctor a bag of 1-up Mushrooms
I realized how they got around teh regeneration limit. You know how his curse for using the moment was going to be to live, what if it didn’t mean live using the moment, but live forever. infinite regenerations.
I hope you’re not serious with this
I think the Bible is exceptionally misogynistic, and I think that that’s because of a) the time and culture it was written in and b) because men wrote it, and men translated and edited it.
And I think you’d have a hard time telling me I’m wrong on this one… granted if you believe God wrote the Bible then sure it wasn’t “misogynistic because men wrote it”, but it’s still misogynistic and if the Biblical God had a gender, it’d be male.
Yeah, perhaps the ‘meme’ was a little extreme, and it was posted with humour in mind so no I was not 100% serious when I posted it, but the first two sentences of this reply?
100% serious and if you think there’s something wrong with that then there’s something wrong with you.
You…what?
I… think the Bible is exceptionally misogynistic, and I think that that’s because of a) the time and culture it was written in and b) because men wrote it, and men translated and edited it.
Hope this clears up your confusion.
But what proof is there that they didnt stone rapists?
There isn’t any proof that, thousands of years ago, people didn’t stone rapists. Absolutely zero.
Which would be relevant if this post was about what people did, as opposed to what God tells people to do, according to the Bible.
What proof is there that the Bible doesn’t feature God telling people to stone rapists? Well, for once in it’s existence, the proof is in the Bible itself!
Although I suppose it’s worth mentioning that a man will be stoned for raping a woman that is already betrothed to another man.Of course, if this happens in the city, the woman will be stoned too because y’know, cities are pretty busy so she obviously didn’t cry out for help otherwise someone would have noticed. I mean it’s basically her fault, the only wrong-doing on the man’s behalf was that it wasn’t his woman, it was someone else’s.
No, really, that’s Deuteronomy 22:23-24, from the Bible.
That book I called misogynistic and had someone question whether I was serious or not.
Anyone else wanna come at me on this one? I’ve clearly got enough time on my hands.
Wait. Hold the FUCK up. Did you just say it was HER fault for being raped? Or are you purposely talking out of your ass? And where does the Bible say or refer to them hating women? All I’ve heard from it that’s involving hatred towards a race/sex/culture or anything of that matter is when people misinterpreted that being gay was a sin. You’re just taking the text way out of proportion and not focusing on the actual meaning of the book. It’s people like you who really piss me off and gets me wondering how anyone could be that way towards anything. You’re honestly just a jackass.
I know that sarcasm doesn’t translate too well over the internet but damn, son, I think it’s pretty clear that no, no I was not saying she deserved to be raped I was saying that according to Deuteronomy if a man has sex with a woman who is engaged, and this occurs in the city, then they should both be put to death because the man tampered with another dude’s property and because the woman didn’t cry out loud enough to attract significant attention to have the dude stopped - therefore she must have been consenting!
I know what the dictionary says but I think the word misogyny is more than straightforward hatred of women, but if you like you can change my words “the Bible is exceptionally misogynistic” to “the Bible is exceptionally discriminatory towards women, often sees them as lower than men, and often sees them as property”, and before you tell me I’m taking anything out of context to reach that conclusion, I got your context right here - if a man has sex with a woman who is engaged to another man but it’s not in the city, so she cannot cry for help, then the woman is excused as she has done no wrong, but the man will be put to death. Which seems kinda lovely until you realise that the Bible makes it very clear that the man isn’t being put to death for the horrific crime of rape, he’s being put to death because the woman was engaged but now he’s ruined her for her future husband by taking her virginity.
It was actually less appalling when it was out of context.
rob, why does nobody ever read?
Olivia Campbell
Want her body!!
I want her body, too. But uh, probably not the way you do.
Gorgeous. This is who I want to be when I grow up
Body envy. Gorgeous
look at god
uhnf… y… yes… yes PLEASE….
This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:
The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.
According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.
When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.
So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.
georgeorsonwelles-deactivated20:
New York Film Academy’s study of gender inequality in the film industry.
Umm, you can’t take the top films as an example and think’s it’s not biased. The producers don’t know which films will be on the top and pick those movies to put women in that position.
So I found my old, 6th grade gaia account page (please don’t actually click it.) and found the original design for my oldest character that I still use, Koda the faded. So I decided to draw the original with his big eyes and angsty teen style and also failed at proportions because I was using a chibi like reference. Luckily, his look has changed a lot over the years. His personality however is still douchey and he still lacks shoes but hey, shirtless man.
YAY ANATOMY FAIL!
Also, I shouldn’t draw faces when I only get 3 hours of sleep two days in a row… or shade…
