Silver Tongue
Parents: Your internet friends/girlfriend don't count, you should find somebody in real life.
Me: Go ahead and try to hit me if you're able.
Can't you see that my relationship is stable?

castielismycherrypie:

spoken-not-written:

incognito-burrito:

moustache-flavoured-lubricant:

watermelonfucker:

bicorn:

a-skyofdiamonds:

tomhiddles:

“I think we should switch places. When camp’s over, I leave as you and go back to London and you leave as me and go to California.”

I LITERALLY STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW THEY MADE THIS FILM WITH ONLY ONE LINDSEY LOHAN

 #finding out lindsey doesn’t have a twin is on my list of top 5 traumatic childhood events

Right up there with finding out that Genovia isn’t a real country.

WAIT GENOVIA’S NOT A REAL COUNTRY

 I THOUGHT IT WAS IN SWITZERLAND

THATS GENEVA YOU CRUMB

YOU CRUMB

mangocianamarch:
““happy Ides of March all y’all plebeians
”
REMIND ME TO REBLOG THIS EVERY MARCH 15TH UNTIL I DIE
”

mangocianamarch:

happy Ides of March all y’all plebeians

REMIND ME TO REBLOG THIS EVERY MARCH 15TH UNTIL I DIE

ruinedchildhood:

W H O    D E C ID E D   T H A T   S A T A N   T Y P ES L I K E   T H I S

mewflower:

a-random-mod:

mewflower:

a-random-mod:

mewflower:

GOD im so tired of the “not all men” thing.
 
>i watch a cartoon and its bad
>very frustrated with the quality of this cartoon, i shout “i hate cartoons!!!!!”
>do i really hate cartoons?? no. i am mad at this cartoon. 

now if a “”better”” cartoon heard me say that, and responded “but what about me, my quality is good!!” i begin to question the quality of that cartoon. why did that cartoon need to defend itself?? is there something wrong with it that im not seeing?? why did it bring itself up when it knows that i was just mad over THAT ONE PARTICULAR CARTOON

It’s almost like generalizing an entire group of people based on the actions of a few is a bad thing

im not getting into this shitty strawman argument with you please realize your social position on this particular issue before you go around spouting regurgitated reddit nonsense

I’m saying that generalizing an entire group of people based on the actions of a few is a bad thing.

Saying “all men X” is a bad thing.

you CLEARLY do not understand what is going on here and im not going to take 20 minutes to explain a concept to you that SHOULD be very simple. please realize what message you’re perpetuating is very toxic and is hurting a lot more people then you probably realize. if i respond after this i’ll probably get mad and put myself on a negative standpoint, so i’m not going to reply anymore and im going to go eat breakfast so thank you for your discussion

Actually you’re the one who doesn’t understand what’s going on here. I wasn’t arguing with anyone. I was agreeing that people shouldn’t generalize an entire group based on their experience with one person. You on the other hand seem to just want to argue for the sake of arguing so I will leave you be now.

mewflower:

a-random-mod:

mewflower:

GOD im so tired of the “not all men” thing.
 
>i watch a cartoon and its bad
>very frustrated with the quality of this cartoon, i shout “i hate cartoons!!!!!”
>do i really hate cartoons?? no. i am mad at this cartoon. 

now if a “”better”” cartoon heard me say that, and responded “but what about me, my quality is good!!” i begin to question the quality of that cartoon. why did that cartoon need to defend itself?? is there something wrong with it that im not seeing?? why did it bring itself up when it knows that i was just mad over THAT ONE PARTICULAR CARTOON

It’s almost like generalizing an entire group of people based on the actions of a few is a bad thing

im not getting into this shitty strawman argument with you please realize your social position on this particular issue before you go around spouting regurgitated reddit nonsense

I’m saying that generalizing an entire group of people based on the actions of a few is a bad thing.

Saying “all men X” is a bad thing.

mewflower:

GOD im so tired of the “not all men” thing.
 
>i watch a cartoon and its bad
>very frustrated with the quality of this cartoon, i shout “i hate cartoons!!!!!”
>do i really hate cartoons?? no. i am mad at this cartoon. 

now if a “”better”” cartoon heard me say that, and responded “but what about me, my quality is good!!” i begin to question the quality of that cartoon. why did that cartoon need to defend itself?? is there something wrong with it that im not seeing?? why did it bring itself up when it knows that i was just mad over THAT ONE PARTICULAR CARTOON

It’s almost like generalizing an entire group of people based on the actions of a few is a bad thing

thankyoucorndog:

popularly:

thankyoucorndog:

3starjammies:

Okay so everyone is always saying gems don’t have ears or whatever, but I was rewatching some and

image

WRONGO

they got ears

ONION THEORY DEBUNKED

WRONG AGAIN !!!!! IT HAS BEEN SAID BY MULTIPLE PEOPLE WHO WORK ON THE SHOW THAT THEY DONT HAVE EARS, BUT CAN HAVE THEM IF THEY SO CHOOSE TOO.

ONION THEORY IS STILL REAL

image
image
Writers and fanartists

toodrunktofindaurl:

Killing a major character is okay, killing the parents is okay, separating the power couple is okay, creating unbearable wars and massive destruction is okay, but never, ever, kill the pet or just one of the twins. Ever.

*immediately thinks of deathly hallows where Hedwig and one of the Weasley twins die*

11orangeroses:

rushierush:

Who Put You On The Planet

i’m so confused