insomniac-arrest:

there’s a lot of intersection between SU and She-Ra: sensitive boys, lesbians, crying people, girls holding swords, transforming into giant ladies, a deadpan blue watery character

here is a brief graph on how to tell the difference between the shows:

thanks for coming to my tedtalk

OBJECTION

wardenasksthings:

This is also good advice. Buuut I’m not done hunting down everything so….I’ll do that later.

you can inspect the element in your blog settings and delete the block that says disabled=disabled which will allow you to switch your blog to sfw

lesbianshepard:

making posts about how tumblr is going to die and about how nothing is going to happen 

yen-sama:

mrs-transmuter:

operativesurprise:

rubes-dragon:

whimmy-bam:

diva-gonzo:

dumbass-oikawa:

conservative-libertarian:

221books:

fuckyourwritinghabits:

cornflakepizza:

winchesterbr0s:

hesmybrother-hesadopted:

czarnoksieznik:

beesmygod:

“chuffed doesnt mean what you think it means”

it means exactly what i think it means its just some stupid word that literally has two definitions that mean the opposite thing

what the hell

This makes me really chuffed

This post is quite egregious

Well I’m nonplussed by this whole post.

goddamnit.

all of you go to hell

And you wonder why i am boggled at times

These are called contronyms! A word that is its own opposite.

Why the fuck do these exist

One theory is that the sarcastic use of the word became exceedingly prevalent and because another dictionary definition. 

Are you telling me that we were such sarcastic shits it literally changed our language.

Literally is another example now.

the english language is just linguistic hack.

one-for-all-plus-ultra:

weirdmageddon:

duplexide:

The bizarre line delivery in the Invader Zim pilot is severely underrated 

its not bizarre at all, thats just how invader zim has always been

magpiebeetle:

probablybadrpgideas:

Each player uses a different RPG rule set. Otherwise it’s completely normal

not-so-tall-gay-danny:

orgyofthelord:

aphony-cree:

lord-kitschener:

voidbattlemage:

weedle-testaburger:

thescotchinthenorth:

arthicat:

elphabaforpresidentofgallifrey:

breaking bad, fight club, rick and morty, clockwork orange, and the catcher in the rye are all arguably good things - but if a man says they are his FAVORITE book/movie/tv show? RUN.

Can someone explain this to me?

They’re all works that are examinations of compelling but deeply flawed (usually narcissistic and violent) men. People rightly like all these works because they are good, but the implication of the original post is that if a guy says they are his favorite work, he is probably misunderstanding the point of the work and instead idolizing the male protagonist and is unable to recognize their flaws.

Basically, ask why they like it. If they like it because they think it’s well-written and made, you’re probably good. But if they want to be like Walter White, or Tyler Durden, or Rick Sanchez, or Alex DeLarge, or Holden Caulfield: yeah, RUN.

Finally I can reblog this post.

This also goes for Mad Men, run like hell from any guy who identifies with/idolizes Don Draper

“It’s a satire. Many don’t get that… My daughter had a friend named Max. She told me ‘Fight Club’ is his favorite movie, I told her never to talk to Max again.” David Fincher, director of Fight Club 

….can I add It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia and BoJack Horseman

^oh big mood. I love Bojack Horseman because the characters are flawed as fuck and I relate to Bojack as a self-destructive mentally ill person, but god fuck do NOT talk to anyone who idolises that shit.

we should put clerks in there too because there are people who relate to Randal without shame