mxgneato:
“ this is canon and im screaming
”

mxgneato:

this is canon and im screaming

rosexknight:

frogii:

internetopia:

fernhat:

inkblotpony:

deltasniper1000:

biff-donderglutes:

dongstomper:

golden-eyedghost:

areyoufromanotherplanet:

andrewbelami:

thatgurlataylor:

autie-commie:

boozevulture:

hamiltonthemusicalfan666:

ikazon:

andrewbelami:

Straight people out here shooting up their own fucking babies

#We did it honey#the evil is defeated (via @beasthenshin)

this is the most white heterosexual nonsense ive ever seen

congrats! your smokebox was blue

this means you will birth a Denim Child

*Jild

I don’t understand why you are all so offended by this. They found out the genre of their baby by doing something they like to do. WHAT THE FUCK IS THE ISSUE HERE? WHY IS EVERYONE ON THIS WEBSITE SO HYPERSENSITIVE ABOUT EVERYONE ELSES LIVES. BACK TF OUT OF PEOPLES BUSINESS FOR FUCKS SAKE.

The genre of their baby

Easy Listening Baby

Smooth Jazz Baby

post-progressive dreamfunk baby

Honey do you see the dreamy blue hues rippling in the residue of the vaporized car? We’re having a vaporwave baby

ハヤテグッドボーイI N F A N T

>tfw no vaporwave baby

image

This post is a journey

i had to read through this post that already started off stressfully and now you do too

This is fucking hilarious.

egberts:

also part of growing up is realizing that the embarrassing music you liked in your early teen years still goes hard as hell

uncle-cucky:

image

I’m lazy - Mspaint doodles are fun

joybates:

shabadadu:

tilthat:

TIL of Carl, a 5-year-old deaf boxer who is unbothered by court noises and accompanies kids during depositions and trials. He offers a sense of protection for children while they face their abusers in court.

via reddit.com

Dude I really honest to god thought there was some 5 year old professional boxer out here helping other kids and like to find out its about a dog just really shook my core

A DOG MAKES SO MUCH MORE SENSE THAN A FIVE YEAR OLD MMA CHAMP

computationalcalculator:

prokopetz:

lostlegendaerie:

prokopetz:

It’s kind of ironic that Wheatley from Portal 2 has become enshrined as the iconic example of fan-artists anthropomorphising everything under the sun as skinny, ambiguously twentysomething white dudes in dapper suits, given that he’s like the one character who actually deserves it.

i saw the explanation one time of “he’s a bumbling idiot with a maddening insistence all his horrible ideas are right, of course he’s a white man” and i’ve never heard anything so true in my life

Definitely there’s that, but I’m more referring to the fact that Wheatley’s literal function in the game’s plot is to stand as a monument to white male mediocrity. Like, it’s not even subtle!

(Him and Cave Johnson both, really, albeit in different ways. Cave is a takedown of how that mediocrity can become romanticised in the sufficiently privileged: an ineffectual blunderer with more money than good sense becomes a daring visionary whose ideas fail to change the world only because the world isn’t ready for them, and any damage he’s managed to cause is reframed as evidence of how far ahead of the curve he is. Wheatley’s the flip side of that coin, the wheedling sycophant who thinks he’s got what it takes to sit in the big-boy chair, but wouldn’t know what to do with that kind of influence if he got it.)

I would’ve called Cave Johnson a “wow, they’re not even trying to be subtle” ripoff-slash-parody of Elon Musk’s career trajectory, were it not for the fact the game came out 7 years ago

egg

egg

Really Useful Life Hacks

spacedoutstatic:

pvwitch:

winelandcounty:

image
image
image
image
image
image

THIS WAS REALLY JARRING TO MY BRAIN AND I FORGOT WHAT DECADE WE ARE IN

@ryukodragon

image

sainatsukino:

curlicuecal:

curlicuecal:

domestication syndrome is one of the coolest findings from recent genetics

image

Yes!

Basically scientists have found that if you start selecting for people-friendly animals, you see a bunch of hypothetically unrelated traits start showing up in all sorts of mammal species: floppy ears, piebald/patterned coats, etc.

image

This is true for everything from cows to dogs to rats! One of the coolest long term studies on this has been the Russian fox experiments.

image

So essentially the science goes like this:

You have two copies of every genes, one from each parent.

We tend to simplify genetics, and say that for every single gene you have it is random,l coin flip which copy you pass on to you offspring. We also tend think of genes as a 1:1 ratio of genes—>traits.

But! This is not quite the case.

Genes have a specific physical location and order relative to each other on your chromosomes, and the chance of genes being inherited together goes up the closer together they are located. This means random, unrelated traits can wind up being more commonly inherited together in specific patterns just because those genes are located close together, and you don’t get that completely random reshuffling of two parent’s traits. Some of them tend to stay “stuck” together.

image

This is called linkage, and it’s why you often see red hair, pale skin, and freckles together, for example.

The second factor that plays into this is that a lot of times 1 gene affects several different traits (or several different genes affect 1 trait). This means that sometimes you really *can’t* untangle two traits because they have a similar cause. For example, say genes for increased aggression are responsible both for making a spider a better hunter (pro) and making a spider more likely to eat its offspring (con). Because the same gene is the cause of both things, natural selection can’t really untangle them.

Circling back to the redhead/freckles/pale skin example, these traits are affected by a number of different genes, but also one gene in particular: MCR1, a gene that changes how your body responds to hormones promoting melanin production. Again, one gene related to pigment production can affect a BUNCH of different traits. (And also skin cancer risk. Fun!)

Domestication Syndrome in mammals turns out to be due to both linkage and genes affect by multiple traits!

See, when we domestic animals we want them to be friendlier/less aggressive, which normally translates to less FEARFUL.

image

And it turns out that the same genes involved in adrenal responses and other stress reactions are also involved in melanin, cartilage, and bone production. So when we domesticate animals we get these recurring changes in pigmentation (white patches, piebald costs), floppy ears (cartilage), shorter muzzles and other changes in physical stature (bone growth), etc.

We also wind up selecting for a lot of neotenic genes in general— that is, retention of childhood traits into adulthood. That’s because baby animals tend to have lots of friendly/trusting/biddable/curious traits we are looking for.

And honestly, who can say no to a face like this?

image

ps, since it was mentioned:

the same genes involved in domestication probably help animals form social groups in general. if you need to get along with and trust strangers you need a decrease in the panic/aggression genes.

cats, for example, probably domesticated themselves when they started living close to each other and to humans to feed off of pests in grain silos.

and yeah, some some recent theories suggest humans may have ‘domesticated’ themselves:

image

so basically you’re saying that when we breed animals to be friends, they become friend-shaped.