Silver Tongue

another philosophical question that is very very related. is Chuck E Cheese a restaurant ?

noctude:

square-opossums:

noctude:

absolutely not. it’s an arcade that happens to have “food”

I respectfully disagree, sir noctude, because arcades lack one thing that Chuck E. Cheese has, performers. So, you may ask, what businesses have games, food, and performers?

a casino

now this is some semantic bullshit i can get behind

saint-vore:

saxifraga-x-urbium:

saint-vore:

saxifraga-x-urbium:

saint-vore:

distantvoices:

I can handle people blazing their nudes but I draw the line at Christian preachers

why shouldn’t the christian preachers be able to blaze their nudes?

i think God said something about it or something

ohhh ok, i didn’t realise they had camera phones back when god wrote that

yah she’s like omniscient or some shit

like she lays eggs?

blobbynfriends:
“My favorite kind of plot twist 😜
”

blobbynfriends:

My favorite kind of plot twist 😜

thegentlemangamer:

greenekangaroo:

alwaysasideways8:

dreamnectar:

ceb3rus:

mattandjones:

snorlaxatives:

who would win in a fight: an army of lush employees vs an army of bath and body works employees??? discuss

lush employees, who are more adept at guerrilla warfare and fabian tactics. bath and body works employees rely too much on pitched battle and are not equipped well enough for prolonged conflict

I disagree with some of that, I feel as though the Bath and Body Works employees are pretty well trained in the art of handling an all out attack. Their defenses are high and well coordinated. Remember, they deal with white moms on the daily, whereas I feel that Lush employees are more used to dealing with a younger generation of customers.I feel as though they’d be equally matched but in the end I feel with the advancement in technology that Lush possesses over Bath and Body Works in terms of sheer amount that they sell, ultimately Lush wins, but not without heavy casualties.

All true, but everyone is forgetting Bath and Body Works employees have extreme training dealing with the hell on Earth that is Semi Annual Sale. Have you ever seen someone come between a white woman in her 40s and Vanilla Bean Noel at 75% off? Bath and Body Works employees have and still live to tell their stories

I think terrain is an important consideration? Lush employees are better at straight melee since they’re used to fighting in close quarters, whereas B&BW employees have more experience in moving through wider terrain and using ranged attacks.

this is the kind of discourse I want on my dash

My wife: “All the B&BW folks would have to do is throw a few water balloons into a Lush store and it would be all over.”

skyhon:

the-real-gingakid:

spoonoftar:

:

How do I explain to you people that interracial relationships are okay

Not every white person dating a POC is fetishizing. White people can be respectful and responsible when it comes to culture and relationships and not everyone has bad intentions.

Asian people can date Black people without you saying shit like “your kids will be so pretty” they’re not dating for pretty kids. They’re dating bc they like each other.

Someone can dress their partner in clothing from their culture if they want. Someone can take their partner to cultural events if they want.

People in relationships can share cultures, experiences and love without it being toxic or skin deep.

Their partner isn’t culturally appropriating. Their partner is being shown the ultimate form of love, bc their partner trusts them and loves them enough to share their history and heritage.

Yeah, dating someone from your culture is nice bc you automatically have similar experiences. But you’re not limited to dating people with the same experiences. Loving someone is sharing and growing and being together.

Interracial relationships aren’t always toxic, and some of y’all need to stop projecting onto other people.

👆 THIS 👆 👏👏👏

Calling ineterracial relationships toxic or fetishizing just seem like anti race mixing or racism with extra steps

This reminded me of this

image
image

fuggmuff:

eleventh-order-simulacra:

yimra:

dangerbooze:

Kings support kings

those wings look good as FUCK

“Will it look better than wingstop?”

King you could deep fry a wet paper towel and look better

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

spartanlocke:

bunnikkila:

schmergo:

Pitch: Muppet Lord of the Rings. Miss Piggy as Eowyn. Imagine her just throwing herself at a human man playing Aragorn. Imagine her defeating the Witch-King of Angmar by going “HI-YA!” and karate chopping him.

Throwing herself at Aragorn

Then Kermit arrives as Faramir and she just bodily pitches Aragorn offscreen

Aragorn is, of course, played by Viggo Mortensen reprising his role

(Gollum falls into the lava of Mount Doom)

Statler: If you ask me Gollum’s the lucky one

Waldorf: The lucky one?

Statler: He doesn’t have to be in the movie any more!

Both: DO-HO-HO-HO-HO-HO!

merry and pippin played by gonzo and rizzo. When the trees lay siege to isengard they fall off a trees shoulders and get stomped on multiple times

thetransintransgenic:

queen-susans-revenge:

irradiate-space:

thetransintransgenic:

The thing I’m most uncomfortable with this going forward is, like, “the Queen of England” is such a major phrase that I don’t think I’ll be able to let go.

And like this isn’t just me – large parts of modern culture, songs, phrases, etc. are based on the understanding that the monarch of England is Queen. (What are the Sex Pistols gonna say, now? “His fascist… raging?”) And with a relatively minor (and rather negative experience, at that) interruption in the middle, this has been the case for the past almost 200 years. This isn’t something we can just CHANGE. I get that she was old and going to die, and if the monarchy was going to continue at all obviously they’d need to find some successor. But everything from that past few centuries makes “King whatever” absolutely incompatible with it.

So, like, obviously that’s not an acceptable situation. Which leaves a clear solution


The Queen is Dead; Force-Fem the King

“Oh, it’s quite simple, your Majesty. There’s way too many laws pertaining to the Queen, describing the Queen’s responsibilities, saying what the Queen can and cannot do. Some of them are load-bearing. Our government can’t pass laws unless the Queen signs off on them, did you know? We can’t update the laws which reference the Queen until we have a Queen, unfortunately. Which means that if you want to be King, you’ll have to be Queen first.”

“Mr. Prime Minister, what must I do to become Queen?”

“We’ve prepared a briefing packet; the laws’ requirements are quite scattershot. We’ve got a team of crack loophole-finders on the case. You must pardon the delicacy of the question, Your Majesty, but have you ever, quote, ‘bled from between the thighs’? If not, we’ll get a nurse in here with a sharp needle for the ceremonial blood spot gathering.”

Oh you laugh, but there’s an edit war happening on Wikipedia right now—people arguing on the Charles III talk page that the Jamaican constitution uses the phrase “Her Majesty,” so Charles constitutionally can’t be King of Jamaica!

IT’S HAPPENING IT’S HAPPENING WE’RE MAKIN’ IT WE’RE MAKIN’ IT REAL

endcant:

endcant:

tonight’s voice call discussion topic: the universal anti-chick-fil-a gay night of fucking

the crew in the discord vc have been engineering a secret plot to wring chick-fil-a dry finanically, since we learned that babies born in chick-fil-a receive a lifetime of free food. gay people (or anybody really) just need to give birth in chick-fil-a to reap the free benefits. but if people start intentionally and habitually giving birth in chick-fil-a, they will quickly change their policy. so everyone needs to converge on their local chick-fil-a locations as simultaneously as possible, which means that 9 months prior there will need to be a universal night of simultaneous anti-chick-fil-a fucking. for gay rights.