isa-ghost:

viostormcaller:

discourse-dot-com:

frostbytemyrik:

purple-penntapus:

Even LGBT people are afraid to create LGBT rep half the time because you fucking goblins critique things with LGBT rep so harshly that the second it does something that you personally don’t like it gets treated even worse than the shows that have absolutely no rep in them.

Demonizing every show that is earnestly trying to provide the rep we’ve been lacking is NOT THE WAY TO GET BETTER REP

Remember when Dream Daddy was called homophobic because a horror-themed (and non-canon, might I add) ending was found in the game’s code? Like y'all go after everything that isn’t the most saccharine, unproblematic, nothing-bad-happens-ever shit and I’m so, so sick of it. This keeps us from getting LGBT+ rep that’s actually interesting and in interesting situations! I want actual stories, but I guess you guys don’t. You just want a perfect little picture to hang on your wall.

Treating all gay people as uwu soft beans is a form of homophobia in itself, and that’s the tea. Make problematic gay characters!! Give lgbt characters flaws!! Give them interesting, non stereotypical personalities!! We’re human, and humans are flawed by nature, so treat us as such and don’t get pissed because of it.

Being LGBTQ+ isn’t our entire personalities, depsite what yall wanna think. We’re people who JUST SO HAPPEN to be LGBTQ+. Not all of us are “soft and pure uwu”, not all of us are flamboyant, there’s so many different types of people all with different personalities and values and ways of doing things and we’re all flawed in some way. All humans are, literally no one is perfect. To treat LGBTQ+ people as people who need to be represented as perfect and unproblematic 100% of the time is an impossible standard.

THIS

Ive seen people accuse rebecca sugar of queerbaiting because ruby was “male coded”

kaijuno:

dr-algernop:

kaijuno:

It’s literally like 55 million light years away

Physicists, Astronomers, and Engineers: Spend over a decade organizing the worlds telescopes to trail a new implement that will allow us to see celestial bodies in previously unimaginable detail culminating in the first picture of a black hole.

Some or these chucklefucks:

Heather Schwedel I just wanna talk

tethraghasts:

ain’t no rest for the wicked: plays under any circumstance

me the literal minute i hear it:

frostytheicecube:

motherhenna:

Then vs. Now memes

holidehg:

Local boy has a tall moirail

elwurd:

elwurd:

UPDATE

dio vs lord english GO

sm980:

filenames:

mmkayn:

vastderp:

lalaland1212:

theatre-whovian:

vastderp:

Meet the Mona Lisa of the Prado, the earliest known copy of Da Vinci’s best portrait. Similarity in the undersketch of the painting indicates that this was very likely painted concurrently with the original Mona Lisa, by a student of Da Vinci.

There is much controversy in the art world over the question of whether or not to clean the fragile Mona Lisa, but her sister has been restored and some fairly odd later alterations removed to show the original vibrant colors and lighting. Some details, such as the sheerness of her shawl and the pattern on the neckline of her dress, have become utterly obscured in the original, but in the restored copy they’re perfectly clear.

It blows my mind a little bit to look at these two sisters side-by-side and imagine how much vivid detail could be hiding in the Mona Lisa under 500 years of rotten varnish. 

THE COPY HAS EYEBROWS

Your response to a beautiful piece of artwork done by Leonardo Da Vinci himself is “SHES GOT EYEBROWS”. Alright. All intelligent life has been lost.

Yo Snooty McSnotwhine, the Mona Lisa’s vanished eyebrows have been the subject of debate and analysis in the art expert community for hundreds of years, long before your parents squirted water at each other from across the clown car and then honked their bicycle horns to indicate they really wanted to make a smug, insufferable little clown baby together. 

this continues to be the best reply to a criticizing comment on this site