gayahithwen:

dstriple:

No one got hurt in this attack. Because the attacker did not use a weapon that can mow down people in seconds… it also didn’t happen in the US.

What’s that about “people will find a way if they really want to kill someone”? No, they won’t. Not having easy access to accurate, deadly, ranged weapons is an effective deterrent to a lot of potentially violent people.

daynapapaya:

kismesister:

friendlytroll:

mamasam:

stopthatimp:

nani was NINETEEN and such a fucking badass who was so protective of lilo and just ROLLED with aliens being a thing towards the end of the movie. #1 Disney relative of all time.

I have honestly been waiting AGES for the right gifset to express the wonderful perfection that is Nani. She is not only protective of Lilo, she respects the way Lilo’s imagination and quirkiness works.

Pudge the fish got a peanut butter sandwich every Thursday. Nani does not argue the logic of feeding him, only suggests an alternative sandwich when they are out of peanut butter. Lilo was allowed to take as many photos of whatever mundane or odd subjects as she wanted and Nani would get them developed. Nani recognized what were important habits for Lilo.

When Lilo asks for a pet lobster, Nani does not tell her that lobsters are not pets. She tells her, “We don’t have a lobster door, we have a dog door.” She makes sure the woman at the pound does not tell Lilo that “Stitch is not a real name”.

NANI SPENDS THE ENTIRE MOVIE MAKING SURE THAT LILO NEVER FEELS LIKE HER IDEAS ARE WRONG.

The only time we truly see Nani get angry with Lilo is when she is scared of Lilo being taken away. Nani spends the entire movie stressed out over taking care of her sister, trying to find a job, trying to make sure her sister has a friend, and yet she is always willing to put that extra effort, over and over again, to make sure that Lilo always believes that anything is possible.

This is a great moment because she probably *remembered* that Lilo said this once. And you know what? Shes not ending this day by letting her little sister think this is her fault. She’s not having an easy time trying to be a parent, but she knows none of this is her sisters fault, and shes not going to let her think it is. 

And half of her terror of losing Lilo isnt even just losing her family; its knowing that wherever Lilo goes, they won’t know how to do these things. They won’t understand her. 

What a good movie. 

Casual reminder that the reason Lilo obsessively feeds the fish is because her parents died in a rainstorm and she firmly believes Pudge controls the weather. If you pay attention to the feeding sequence you will notice that storm clouds recede and dissipate, a visual narrative that confirms this.

It’s not just a habit. It’s a very real part of Lilo’s healing process and Nani understands that.

Also if you pay attention to Nani’s room you’ll notice she had surfing posters and trophies. She was very much on her way to being a pro surfer but had to give it up to become the adult Lilo needed her to be.

And not ONCE does Nani show her sister any resentment. It’s worth it to keep her family together. This is a young woman who is willing to sacrifice all of her dreams and make incredibly grown up decisions.

What I am saying is Nani is the best disney princess of all time. Disney Queen even.

dmichellewrites:

marvelismylife:

Archers gotta stick together

image
bloggemort:
“He is such and icon
”

bloggemort:

He is such and icon

deadmugen:
“ isometriclove:
“ eternal-nova:
“ profeminist:
“ Source
Want more info? Here ya go:   This Biology Teacher Disproved Transphobia With Science  ALSO:
Sex redefined “The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider...

deadmugen:

isometriclove:

eternal-nova:

profeminist:

Source

Want more info? Here ya go: 

image

This Biology Teacher Disproved Transphobia With Science 

ALSO:

Sex redefined

“The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that.”

More on anti-trans arguments as bad science

I LOVE THIS

Reblog cuz I didn’t even know some of this shit.

the world is way too weird for that shit

systlin:

systlin:

systlin:

Anyway, if you read marriage certificates from church records, a full 85% of first marriages for young women were around 18-19 years old. The rest skewed higher, into the early twenties, with only a few being below that age and only one in a thousand was younger than 16. 

The age of puberty has declined over the centuries as girls get better nutrition, as well, so throughout the middle ages the age at which a girl could expect her first period was around 16, where modern girls often get it much younger. 

The idea that women in earlier ages were married and mothers in their early teens is a myth. Marriages of children were usually only between noble families, and made for political reasons, or creepy old bastards who wanted a child-wife and could get away with it because they were rich and powerful. They often would point to the fact that the Roman elite did the same thing as justification. The Romans, of course, would point to the Greeks doing the same thing as justification, the Greeks pointed at the Assyrians, and so on back through the ages. 

It was considered disgusting by normal people then and still is. 

This myth is still brought out and touted by sick fuckers. Know it for what it is; a falsehood. 

@firmmaster515

“Good ol’ Tumblr. Making up history that flies in the face of well known historical record so they can be upset. Marriage at 14 ans younger was common throughout much of the world and history. You hit puberty, you’re ready to make it happen.”

No. I cited well known historical record. This is public record and easily available in digitized form, and is widely known by medieval scholars who study the primary sources. But if you want it in more accesible form, go read the following. 

“Medieval Households”, David Herlihy, Harvard University Press, 1985. He did extensive research in European records from the time. 

“The world we have lost”, Peter Laslett. Details over a thousand marriage certificates from the time. He read through thousands more to write the work. 

There are many more excellent scholarly sources that have been cited by other people who study history in the notes on this post. 

The only one making up history that flies in the face of historical record to justify attraction to children here is you. 

@firmmaster515

This mysterious public record you talk about citing, but you insist no one bother because it’s so hard to comb through and never say where or when you’re even getting your data. 1700s Britain is going to be wildly different than 1200s Venice and 600s German states. Even across the world today, the age of legal marriage without parental consent is 16. And even in the US there is no minimum age with parental consent.

So anyway guys here’s a fuckin pedo for you all to block. 

And, just so ya know buddy, you can find digitized church records from the medieval period by, like, googling them. I recommended those books because some people find the records somewhat daunting and I wished to offer a good source that is easily read. 

You can go read through the church records all ya want go right ahead. Please do. I want you to. 

Oh and here’s a chart listing the average age for first marriage in every country in the entire world and yep it says I’m right

And they’re not that different. After studying all of those periods, the age of marriage remains remarkably consistent; 17-19, ranging upwards into the early twenties. 

Anyway go read those sources for a few months bud then get back to me when you’re ready to stop getting your ‘historical’ info from Game of Thrones. 

mademoiselleenjolras:

pencilbent:

if-only-angels-could-prevail:

the saddest sight in the world is a married couple at a musical and the wife is super excited and happy and the husband looks like he was dragged along and he’s making a big deal about how much he doesn’t want to be there and the wife gets embarrassed or ashamed. this isn’t a funny post, it’s actually heartbreaking and i see it happen at like every other musical i attend.

Yeah, as an usher what makes me sad is when I see wives clearly dressed in their Sunday best, beaming and buying merch and smiling at me as I hand them a program, toting some guy dressed in jeans and a sweatshirt who declines a program. And that’s at least a quarter of the couples who come in or more. Like come on man, she really loves this stuff, can’t you try to enjoy it for her at least?

About as bad as when you see a big-eyed kid who looks like this is the greatest day of their life, all excited to see this show, and their parent/grandparent/aunt/Cousin/Friend/whoever they convinced to take them keeps making fun of them and saying how dumb or ridiculous they’re being. For Gods sake, this is a person you care about and this is a thing that means a lot to them. Smile, get off your phone, and be happy for them.

bunjywunjy:

duckbunny:

morkaischosen:

probablybadrpgideas:

Your players are faced with an ancient Sumerian curse! However, since the early ancient Sumerian language was only used for recording tax debts, it turns out to actually be an ancient Sumerian bill.

and therefore they need to get hold of some ancient Sumerian coinage and bring it to the ruins of the ancient Sumerian tax office, because the Sumerians had a pleasingly direct way of preventing tax evasion, namely horrifying curses.

well I don’t have any coin but I have these copper ingots, lovely copper ingots, from a very reputable merchant, never heard a word said against him, very thorough with his paperwork, anyway they’re guaranteed pure copper and proper weight, so can I pay my tax with those?

I just want everyone to take a step back for a second and really think about how we’re using the most powerful knowledge tool in history to make jokes about a specific dude who lived almost 4000 years ago.

it’s fuckin wonderful, is what it is.