That is not funny
That is not cute
It is animal abuse
BIRDS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO EAT CHOCOLATE
BIRDS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE COATED IN CHOCOLATE
Why the fuck do you think birds who get coated in oil die? It’s for the same goddamn reason.
You idiots can have all the chuckles you want over the fact that that poor animal is “living the dream” but I hope you also know that it probably died from that.
And if you still find it funny then I genuinely do not want to associate with you and can only wish upon you the most the most painful and awful death imaginable.I just want to point out that no one is forcing that bird into the chocolate
no one pulled the damn thing in
Inf act, it fully appears to be waddling into the foundain by its damn self
Calm the hell down chocolate is not the same thing as chocolate
Its just a bird making a mistake and its fucking funny
It’s not animal cruelty unless someone was holding that bird at gunpoint
fucking christListen here cum-slut, I bet you 5 million dollars that you don’t own a bird. But guess what? I own 7. And I can tell you right now that a bird would never just walk into something like a chocolate fountain. They’ll rarely walk directly into water. But say that your idiotic theory is correct. Say it did actually walk into it. That animal still probably died. Is that still funny to you? Do you still get your kicks out of knowing that that bird was probably terrified and opening its mouth to scream in that last panel? And if you say yes then you seriously disgust me as a human being.
God bless the people in the notes who think this is an actual criticism of DuckTales (2017).
The image is a screencap of a cartoon series, Ducktales, which stars anthropomorphic ducks. In the screencap, one of the ducks is drinking chocolate out of a chocolate fountain.
The comments are in reference to a Tumblr post from several years ago.
There was a gifset going around of a bird walking into a chocolate fountain. One Tumblr user angrily posted that it was evidence of animal abuse, prompting an argument about whether or not this constituted animal cruelty. For a while, people liked to copy and paste the things the arguing users said to each other. It became a meme based on two things: (1) the over-the-top nature of the argument, and (2) the fact that the gifset was of a CGi animated bird from the movie Jack and Jill, starring Adam Sandler. The bird wasn’t real, rendering the already strange fight completely moot.
