omgkalyppso:

apoliticalfemdomappreciator:

Yes!!!  Bring this back!!!

bumblesnail:

we get TWO kitty starters ?!

i think the thing this post fails to emphasize is that he was correct. a t-rex was indeed the cause of death

genderfox:

ndiecity:

aloyssobek:

i cannot even BEGIN to explain why this is a bad idea

So basically what I’m hearing is theyre lowering the drinking age to “ehh whatever”

Three children in a trenchcoat holding up a stock photo of an old person to the camera and getting away with four liters of 100 proof vodka

thestarvedghost:

disastergay:

ok maybe there are still some funny people on twitter

laurenbudoren:

Did I ever tell you guys that I made another one?

xxtc-96xx:

I actually might lean to that Apple Dino

bubble bobble

lachances:

lachances:

lachances:

I made a boomer oc to infiltrate Facebook groups with

look at my man, I lovingly crafted him on artbreeder and have passed through the cracks with him seamlessly

capitalism win! my boomer Facebook gets viagra ads

animeengineer:

butchscientist:

the idea of “if a workplace is good to its workers then they wouldn’t need a union” has got things the wrong way around. if a hypothetical workplace already treats its workers right & cares about them then it would have no reason to oppose workers unionizing because a union isn’t threatening unless you’re abusing your workers :)

I’ve heard of several cases of good workplaces unionizing. None of them made the news because there was no real conflict. The workers say, “Hey, we’re unionizing,” the boss says, “Okay. Let us know when you’re done organizing.” And that’s about it. It actually simplified things a bit for the management because some of the things HR was doing were taken over by the union. Since they weren’t actively trying to exploit the workers, business just went on like usual. Boring as hell.