luullaby:

didyousaymaraudersormurder:

dovewithscales:

hyratel:

dovewithscales:

messy-scandinoodle:

dovewithscales:

virtuous-thing:

baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:

heartgemsona:

erotic-yoddeling:

bemusedlybespectacled:

nonlinear-nonsubjective:

sonneillonv:

castiel-for-king:

maliwanhellfires:

just-shower-thoughts:

Mammals both produce milk and have hair. Ergo, a coconut is a mammal.

I know you’re being facetious, but this is an actual issue with morphology-based phylogeny.

*leans over and whispers to person beside me* what are they talking about

*leans over and whispers back*  Human ability to quantify and categorize natural phenomena is sketchy at best and wildly misleading at worst

consider the coconut

this reminds me of that time Plato defined humans as “featherless bipeds” and Diogenes ran in with a plucked chicken screaming “BEHOLD A MAN!”

i love how you say “it reminds me of that time” like you were there.

listen if an immortal feels brave and supported enough to come out we should respect them

This post is a journey

1 Reblog = 1 Respect

I maintain that humans started attempting classify animals, and some god or another made the platypus, and is still laughing.

Zeus: *hits joint* okay so like. It’s gonna have a duck bill right. But an otter body okay? And then a beaver tail. It’s a mammal. But. It lays eggs!

Hades: wait wait dude. Give it. Give it poison. Make it poisonous

Athena: You mean venomous, and make sure the eggs have both reptile and bird traits.

Hermes: *takes the joint* Give it extra senses.

Poseidon: It should be aquatic.

I MEAN where’s the lie

Demeter: … And where exactly do you expect me to put this?

Everyone: Australia.

WAIT A PLATYPUS IS VENOMOUS

It mesmerizes me how this has evolved to such olympian hights

daily-xefros:

-mod four

jacobtheloofah:

ablubluh:

voremegriffin:

babbydriver:

there are only 2 images here but there’s also somehow 9 Moods

Disappointment, Cunning, Anger

Discomfort, Sarcasm, Revulsion

Love, Fear, Distain

I am open to criticism.

hey yeah i agree with your analysis but i do have some small criticisms re: your username vis a vis it’s pretty bad

these three posts read like justin, travis, and griffin in that exact order

obovoid:

midtown120blues:

chinon:

my wife: actively pushing out our baby

me: holding my phone with cafeastrology[dot]com open in the browser and staring at the clock, ready to calculate its birth chart any minute now

my wife struggles to keep the baby in for just five more minutes at 11:55pm on april 20th just so we can avoid having to raise an aries

are you telling me you’d rob your child of being born on 4/20 because of astrology

@probablyfakeblonde

daily-karkat:

rynies:

mrpinchy:

TWILIGHT ALEXSTRASZA in HotS 

Spyro looking real good, wow

scarecrowartist:

skygemspeaks:

gimme-more-waffles:

in-demigodishness-and-all-that:

lucker-st0mpp:

pinupatheart:

boobscupcakesnweed:

I shall reblog whenever I see this….

the amount of perfection in that paragraph makes my heart happy.

I’m a Christian and I support this message.

i think i’m crying that’s so perfect

There’s also the fact that the reason Jesus died on the cross was so that Christians no longer had to follow the laws of the Old Testament.

By denying homosexuals the right to marry because of what it says in Leviticus, you are basically saying that Jesus’ sacrifice WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU.

PREACH.

kianamaiart:

Continued under the cut!

Keep reading

alyesque:

alyesque:

its kind weird how i missed the memo about harrassing trans lesbians and calling them heterosexuals being the crucial strategy that will finally topple the patriarchy

For real though to see the amount of time some radical feminists spend just pretty much entirely devoted to ~the trans issue~ is really odd because you kinda have to wonder how someone looks at modern patriarchal society and says “this incredibly small part of the population are in fact the linchpin and cornerstone of patriarchy and arguing they shouldn’t exist is the most useful form of feminist praxis I can engage in”

Its not particularly surprising when you read gyn/ecology and the transsexual empire and it becomes clear that this emerges from a literal conspiracy theory about men trying to replace the need for cis women by creating artificially construct frankenstein women in their own dionysian and techno-necrophillic image. Like just typing that (legit the argument Mary Daly makes in gyn/ecoloy) has me in awe of the amount of absurd conspiritorial thinking these people are engaged in to get to this point.