t4tworfzia:

t4tworfzia:

mom, dad……. i’m adopted

son, we have something to tell you. you’re gay

j-static:

wasdplz:

nightmare-grass:

Why is this the funniest thing I’ve ever seen

can’t remember if i’ve reblogged this before but i stumbled across it again at 9pm and am sitting here cryIN G, SO

How the fuck did the entire internet’s sense of humor make one hell of a 180 in 7 years?

lordascapelion:

scope-dogg:

tilthat:

TIL there are 3 types of fun: Type 1 fun is enjoyable while it’s happening. Type 2 fun is miserable while it’s happening, but fun in retrospect. Type 3 fun is not fun at all, not even in retrospect.

via reddit.com

How the fuck is activity that’s no fun during or after it considered a type of fun

You know how a lot of people play a game called League of Legends?

sliversoakley-deactivated202008:

xxtc-96xx:

don’t question it Ash, just get her the tomato berry

marypickfords:

First stream of the new dnd campaign!

Starting a new dnd campaign in 30 minutes. come watch it on twitch. I will post the link soon

adurot:

akradicalgardener:

spinningorigins:

regularlesbian:

not to be reformist but i just realized requiring employers to treat a commute as time on the job would probably make american cities profoundly more habitable

I am having trouble understanding. Can you, or someone else who knows more about this please provide further explanation?

if employers were paying for commute time (as is standard in several countries), spending less time commuting would be incentivized. cities would be more compact and take less time to traverse than across urban sprawl. i also interpreted it to mean that cities would also have more diverse transportation infrastructure, instead of the heavily-trafficked slog of the freeway. efficient public transport, walkability, etc.

It’s cute you think they would invest in infrastructure instead of just refusing to hire people who lived further away than the more expensive downtown housing.