Literally no anime death will be dirtier than the death of Maes Hughes
Like, you set up this guy to be the comic relief–FIRST OFF, that is DIRTY as hell. You don’t KILL the comic relief, THE comic relief is supposed to LIVE (or die a very tragic death)
They set up Maes Hughes to be this family man AGAIN, DIRTY. AS. HELL.
It’s just as bad as that “2 days from retirement” bullshit except WE ACTUALLY SEE HIM doting about his family EVERY SINGLE CHANCE–
EVERY SINGLE CHANCE HE GETS HE TALKS ABOUT HOW WONDERFUL HIS FAMILY IS.
THE LAST THING HE SEES BEFORE HE DIES IS HIS WIFE’S FACE. WHAT THE FUCK. THAT IS SO BAD, LIKE WHY. WHY THE FUCK. FCKUING THAT IS SO DIRTY. LIKE LIKE–
AND THEN! AND THENNNNNN! NOT 5 MINUTES AFTER HIS DEATH
THEY BURY THE FUCKER
THEY BURY MAES HUGHES BECAUSE HE IS DEAD AND HE DIED AND HE IS no longer LIVING
AND the final NAIL on the coffin, HA-AHAHA_HAHAHA…………
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
HIs daughter is AT the funeral. AND SHE’S LIKE
WHY ARE THEY BURYING DADDY MOM
HE WONT BE ABLE TO DO ANY OF HIS WORK IF HES UNDERGROUND
FUCK THIS SHOW
FUCK IT
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF UCK IT
Ohio State University took the extraordinary step of revoking a graduate’s doctorate last week. Now her future at the University of Arizona, where she is an assistant professor of communication, is unclear.
Jodi Whitaker’s problems started in 2015, after scholars in two countries noticed irregularities in the data in her 2012 paper on video games. The study in Communication Research, called “‘Boom, Headshot!’ Effect of Video Game Play and Controller Type on Firing Aim and Accuracy,” found that playing a violent video game improved real-life shooting skills. Initially, it was something of a boon for both Whitaker, then still a graduate student at Ohio State, and her co-author and dissertation committee chair, Brad J. Bushman, the Margaret Hall and Robert Randal Rinehart Chair of Mass Communication there. That’s because Bushman served on President Obama’s committee on gun violence and his research challenges what he calls myths about violence, including that violent media have a trivial effect on aggression.
But Patrick Markey, a professor of psychology at Villanova University – whose own findings on video gamesclash with Bushman’s – soon challenged the paper, as did Malte Elson, a postdoctoral researcher in educational psychology at Ruhr University Bochum in Germany. Together they alerted the Committee of Initial Inquiry at Ohio State to what they called irregularities in some of the variables of the data set. The values of questioned variables could not be confirmed because the original research records were unavailable, according to Communication Research, which in 2016 decided that a retraction was warranted.
Bushman was cleared of wrongdoing by Ohio State, but he agreed to the retraction. He also agreed to the retraction of another paper in which Whitaker was not involved – one finding that watching violent cartoons inhibits children’s learning – earlier this year, as reported by Retraction Watch. Data on a second 2016 paper by Whitaker and Bushman (on which Bushman was the lead) also have been corrected; that study found that “catharsis beliefs” attract people to violent video games.
But Whitaker, the 2012 paper’s lead author, was found responsible for the errors. And Ohio State’s Board of Trustees voted unanimously last week to revoke her doctorate, granted in 2013.
I am Silver Tongue, I am an artist. I have many characters and you can check out my art in the art tag. I occasionally practice witchcraft though I don't do anything too complicated. I am girl 2 and don't know what else to put here.
Anonymous
