sluttylouboutin:

mentally-illectric:

queeringfeministreality:

flying-prussian-pugs:

rules-broken-fate-rewritten:

stickthinmodels:

feminspire:

YES!

IMPORTANT

the second one? i can buy that somewhat. the first one? breasts are sexual organs.

I SWEAR TO FUCK. NO. NO THEY ARE NOT. BREASTS ARE MEANT TO FEED BABIES. BREASTS ARE NOT MEANT FOR SEXUAL FUCKING PLEASURE. BREASTS SOLE EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE ARE TO FEED THE YOUNG, NOT TO HUMOUR MEN IN BED.

^^^^^^^^^ yesssss

when did this breasts are sexual organs rumor begin and where and why

Playboy magazine

Breast are for feeding babbies. They are non sexual and a a secondary gender trait. The male equivalent would be an adams apple, though it’s not as useful.
Boobs are for babbies.

  1. societyhatesmyactivism reblogged this from the-crow-father
  2. thatpurplefeeling reblogged this from serenelyme-blog
  3. optimal-phenomena reblogged this from halessails
  4. aceofmoxes reblogged this from aceofmoxes
  5. amfi-inc reblogged this from babesbooksandbattles
  6. r0244 reblogged this from baskinginweirdness
  7. foodielemonshark reblogged this from herundiscloseddesires
  8. lynx-chaos reblogged this from vegetta-y-willy
  9. notapornbot-realme reblogged this from dorothycastlemore
  10. dabbinspacecowboy reblogged this from lesbian---advice
  11. sortedsoon reblogged this from lolafett
  12. 51kas81 reblogged this from slow-burn
  13. underyourland reblogged this from aceofmoxes
  14. swimmingbirdrunningrock reblogged this from aceofmoxes
  15. angelmelendez97 reblogged this from thehighkeyfangirl
  16. kursed reblogged this from kursed
  17. shiroroos reblogged this from allmyhanddrawnsoul
  18. w-e-chard reblogged this from allmyhanddrawnsoul
  19. allmyhanddrawnsoul reblogged this from allmyhanddrawnsoul and added:
    @staff
  20. isa-fox reblogged this from existentially-ruined
  21. the-real-f-word-feminism posted this