Perspective on art pricing…

glacierclear:

My teacher was lecturing in class, and we got into the discussion of pricing your art. He talked about how he priced a 30 minute figure drawing, and got a complaint from someone that a drawing that took 30 minutes shouldn’t cost as much as it did, since it only took the time of 30 minutes to create.

He argued that a customer who buys art isn’t just paying for the time put into that art piece, but the time invested over the years in getting to that point. If someone has crafted their art for 30 years, then the customer should pay for that 30 years put into their art. I thought that was a pretty good point, and something people should think about.

You’re not just paying for that singular art piece, but the hours of improvement that the artist has devoted into their art.

  1. its-tabuko reblogged this from azuredreamer123
  2. azuredreamer123 reblogged this from conspicuouslad
  3. aloveablepsycho reblogged this from frist--xvi
  4. brainedbysaucepans reblogged this from conspicuouslad
  5. conspicuouslad reblogged this from frist--xvi and added:
    I keep seeing this mentality and I don’t think it’s a good idea to be promoting it. You see, you shouldn’t be valuing...
  6. muaaimoi reblogged this from pink-flood
  7. aclsd reblogged this from pink-flood
  8. pink-flood reblogged this from dendropsyche
  9. dendropsyche reblogged this from evanthelynn
  10. hexmodreblogs reblogged this from ambris
  11. trackerdog reblogged this from thedenofravenpuff
  12. silverlightpony reblogged this from ambris