kilalabunnies:

tekki-chan:

hoody-hoody:

Is your idea of porn like, holding hands or something?

How the hell do you look at Linkle’s design and get “Sexualized” from it?

In a game that has this

you have the audacity to call this

“Sexualized?!”

Seriously?

They’re shorts.

SHOOOOOORTS 

how the fuck are shorts “sexualized?”

“Oh no, I can see part of her thighs! when will the hyper-sexualized character designs in video games end?! Avert your eyes, hide the children!”

Y’all need significantly less Jesus.

Bunch of tight-ass grandmas on this site, good lord.

I saw people defending Cia and saying “she’s not sexualized because she’s enpowering to women!!1!!111”.

Linkle is adorable, this reminds me of the time idiots were calling Roll Caskett “sexualized” for her shorts.

@silver-tongues-blog speaking of stupid things people are saying about Linkle

Also, just because a woman wears revealing cloths doesn’t mean it’s sexist. That’s a very prude thing to say. Shaming someone for wearing revealing cloths is just as sexist as a guy telling woman to wear something more sexy when she doesn’t want to. Cia wasn’t sexist because she was dressing for herself. REVEALING CLOTHS =/= SEXIST
If ganon was forcing her to wear the revealing cloths, that would be sexist but she was a solid character so it worked for her.

I got off topic but yeah, whether or not clothing is sexist depends on the reason they wear it and shaming someone for wearing the cloths they want is sexist.