- an absolute pun master ( pomeraisins, chairiel, pomer-granite, moldbygg, good morningstar, detemmienation )
- a nerd ( loox eyewalker, anyone? snowdecahedron, ‘truly the most tsundere of plants’ )
- sarcastic ( ah! wow! woah! it’s a ‘hole’, the entirety of the snow poffs, ‘that’s great if you’re a microwave fan’ )
- has an extreme opinion on licorice
- a child ( look at these cool toys! )
- a dog person
- able to knit
- willing to put themself through a LOT of pain ( buttercup incident )
- a gardener ( ‘perfect for cutting plants and vines’ )
- rather knowledgeable about monsters
- a victim of abuse
- willing to play along with asriel ( smile for the camera!, the ‘creepy face’ tape )
- pessimistic
- nonbinary
- has a rather large vocabulary
- silent when you fight toriel and asgore
- the hope of humans and monsters
#wait hold on #so that text isn’t frisks thoughts???? #it’s chara??? #someone explain #undertale
hello!! i am the someone that will explain.
basically, there’s a theory that chara provides all the narration text. this is supported by many pieces of evidence. the narration always refers to frisk in the second person ( ‘it’s you!’, ‘froggit attacks you!’, ‘you win!’, etc etc ), except during a no mercy run. by then, it’s canonically chara that is in control. the narration switches to first person ( ‘it’s me!’, ‘in my way’, etc etc ). in no mercy, the narration also describes various items in asgore’s house in first person too.
the narration also provides the player/frisk with lots of information that frisk would not know, most notably through the ‘check’ option. chara would know that to peacefully beat a loox, the solution is to ‘don’t pick on him.’ or that shyren is ‘a talented singer, with a little help.’
the narration also translates for the froggits. frisk would not know how to beat these monsters or the froggits’ language. chara, in their long time spent underground, would.
there’s other pieces of evidence, but those are the most prominent.