So according to computer scientists, the election results might have been hacked in 3 important swing states. x x
“The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners”
are you SHITTING ME
Donations have slowed down hugely, so I figured this needs to come back.
In answer to something I’ve seen floating around: Yes, the goal has gone up twice. No, this isn’t shady at all.
They set goals based on the estimated cost of a recount in each state in turn. I first saw this page when the target was 2.5 mil, and even then it clearly explained that, with fees, attorney costs, recount watchers, etc factored in, the total bill for all three states was expected to be 6-7 million. They set the goals so that if theyfailed they could still do something. Now they’re on track to do everything.
If we can get them the rest of the way there.