Let me break down everything wrong with this tweet.
To start it categories everyone who values free speech as a white liberal. It singles out a single race and a single political viewpoint, ignoring all others in order to promote it’s hateful viewpoint.
It ignores entirely the reasons why people, no matter their race nor their political stance would want the 1st amendment to be protected.
Calling a speech ‘hatred’ is entirely opinionated, it’s based on pure emotion and little facts, it’s sole purpose to prevent a dialogue occuring.
Lastly, to state that someone who defends a persons right to free speech is promoting white supremacy is ludicrious. That same person would defend a black supremacist, a pro-lifer and a pro-choicer. To them it does not matter the content of the speech, because everyone has the right to have their voice heard.
Let me break down everything wrong with this text response
suck my stinky fat ass, mac demarco bich ass
@ everyone claiming that nazis have the freedom of speech to spout hateful rhetoric. You should actually read the constitution for two reasons.
1) The first amendment only protects people from being prosecuted by the government for what you say. It does not protect you from being subjected to the judgement of your peers.
2) only protects you as long as your actions do not present a clear and present danger. Nazis and white supremacists calling for multiple genocides is not protected by the first amendment.
The first amendment does NOT protect Nazis or White Supremacists being hateful
cusstardcrush liked this
bitchpork4 liked this
r1-sw-lover liked this
sonofsimon liked this the-quasar-literata reblogged this from dumbestboyinalltheland
know-bunny liked this
bats-backward said:
No. Taking away freedom of speech is not the move, no matter the words being spoken. haughtdiggitydaffodil reblogged this from linguist25
jfictitional liked this mccullersisalonelyhunter reblogged this from squeackygee
dr-treyf posted this
- Show more notes
