snorlaxatives:

i am fully aware that stricter gun control regulations would not be an immediate fix to all the mass shootings just because america has long fostered a culture of violence and terrible tragedies are destined to happen no matter what… but literally what negative impact would stricter gun laws have?? maybe it wouldn’t be an immediate fix because “people will find a way to get them anyway” but is it not a step in the right direction?? like, i genuinely for the life of me can not understand why anyone would be against this 

Reblogged 3 years ago from newbarrk (Originally from snorlaxatives)
6,517 notes
Source: snorlaxatives
  1. 1-2-3-4-getthefuckawayfromme reblogged this from darrenpillowscriss
  2. necrovorous reblogged this from snorlaxatives and added:
    Because it isn’t a step in the right direction. At all. Firearms are used defensively more then 250,000 times a year...
  3. dysfunctionalshe reblogged this from unsureprincess
  4. unsureprincess reblogged this from sleepy-spyce
  5. kaleidojpg said: @never2bsober a hand gun can kill many people, it’s all about how people use them. guns aren’t the issue, just bc some people are idiots with them does not make it ok to strip the rest of us of one of our human rights (self defense)
  6. emespre reblogged this from disgruntledmenshevikjohnmulaney
  7. hiddentreasvre reblogged this from disasterpigeon
  8. vessel-at-best reblogged this from disasterpigeon
  9. disasterpigeon reblogged this from reverseracistpoc
  10. albeitawkwardalliterations reblogged this from jungwildeandfree
  11. never2bsober said: Do u need an automatic weapon for self defense. No. U could manage with a handgun and that can’t massacre people
  12. ragons reblogged this from nuclear-brachy
  13. nuclear-brachy reblogged this from lunarvale
  14. lunarvale reblogged this from nuclear-brachy
  15. snorlaxatives posted this