bunnikkila:

rootbeergoddess:

jamaicanblackcastoroil:

ghostrockband:

blackberryshawty:

bubblegum-pwussay:

goldhornsandblackwool:

bubblegum-pwussay:

trueconfessionsofacurvygirl:

xilliannax:

Both Ursula wanted to get the Kings power. She saw and opening and took it.

Ariel was a dumbass who went to her fathers enemy and really thought she was going to be fair

^^^ Ursula was just honest. She literally told Ariel men wanted her to be dumb and silent and the girl was just like ‘okay!’. Ariel READ the contract and willingly submitted to the conditions. There’s no law saying Triton can’t be contested for power. If he had been a more attentive father to Ariel, she wouldn’t have been a liability this way.

My client, Ursula, is innocent.

My client lmfaooo Triton I feel like tried his best Ariel was really stubborn and didnt listen to anybody she didnt even try to read the contract all she wanted was that man.

There are laws against minors signing contracts without the supervision of a parent or legal guardian for a reason. And while those laws vary depending on like jurisdiction the girl was under 18 and we can agree Ursula’s actions sought to prey on the naïveté that comes with youth.

Also Ursula breaches the fairplay clause of making a contract by having the eels interfere with Ariels ability to fulfill the terms and conditions of the contract. Common sense aside, compounded with the fact that she is a minor Ursula is indeed guilty and is a villain

I love this thread

Every time I see it, more is added

Ursula took advantage of a minor fleeing an emotionally abusive environment after a violent outburst on the part of a parent. GUILTY.

Sebastian is the only innocent person in the film