iamilex:

lappislazuli:

postmarxed:

postmarxed:

wormsounds:

HELL WORLD OH MY GOD

image

FBI is really just straight up developing Trojan horse apps now

image
image

The people in the comments are amazing, like, half of them are saying “aren’t these the normal permissions for an fitness app?” And the answer is yes. Of course they are. Your regular fitness app is a takes a ton of data on you in order to function, and that data may or may not be stored with the company for a period of time.

But here’s the thing, when the FBI needs location data on someone, they need a WARRANT to get that information from that company, or that company’s cooperation. Back in the early 2000s, there were a number of companies that simply handed over data to letter agencies like the NSA or FBI, and they got roasted for it by their customers. Don’t fool yourself, the only reason why backdoors weren’t coded into your phones by companies like Apple is because they did the math and realized that the cost of cooperating and alienating their customer base was too high, not because these companies have ethics.

So we live in a climate where companies are promising users security and privacy, and when they don’t it’s a scandal that loses them customers and money. They aren’t playing nice with the FBI, so what is the FBI to do? Easy. Circumvent silicon valley.

There is exactly zero reason for the FBI, as an organization, to make entertainment apps. Educational is maybe in line with past practices, but even when they did stuff like that in the 90s, we called it out for the propaganda it was. This app is absolutely a trojan horse. This is so they can get the data you would normally give to a 3rd party company without a warrant.

Please, ffs, learn internet history. Go take a look at the EFF website and archives. Look up the patriot act and the AT&T scandal with the NSA from around 2004. Lots of people on here were barely children pre 9/11, but you can’t possibly understand surveillance and internet policing until you understand what happened to society and privacy from 2001-2010

This is exactly what I was saying, but better. Yes, these are normal permissions. No, you should not give this data to the FBI.

  1. cpt-nem0 reblogged this from thebloggerformerlyknownasmadcap
  2. tamp0nicus reblogged this from thebloggerformerlyknownasmadcap
  3. thebloggerformerlyknownasmadcap reblogged this from thebloggerformerlyknownasmadcap
  4. alonsimo reblogged this from prince-uricc
  5. prince-uricc reblogged this from tardis-in-a-moonbeam
  6. newsinfosideblog reblogged this from akane-tamru
  7. generalace135 reblogged this from plaidbakerstreetcaptain
  8. antifaiscool reblogged this from peace-and-anarchy
  9. dempireneko reblogged this from dillenger4u
  10. withloveeaudrey reblogged this from bamboostalk
  11. bamboostalk reblogged this from dillenger4u
  12. dillenger4u reblogged this from queensizequeen
  13. amuzatempo reblogged this from adhsea
  14. amerikanskaya-krassavitsa reblogged this from citizen-of-gallifrey
  15. citizen-of-gallifrey reblogged this from plaidbakerstreetcaptain
  16. meme-catalog reblogged this from maddeningmagic106
  17. themindbunker reblogged this from womancy
  18. melody-magic reblogged this from adhsea
  19. adhsea reblogged this from icethedragon
  20. jethroholy reblogged this from consultingcomposer
  21. 16-bitcoffee reblogged this from consultingcomposer
  22. inkdeathrose reblogged this from consultingcomposer
  23. consultingcomposer reblogged this from blackbirdgrey
  24. likechewingontinfoil reblogged this from yukoncorneliusofficial
  25. themegfisher reblogged this from keelinbdeelin
  26. twittytelly reblogged this from pagesoflauren
  27. keelinbdeelin reblogged this from pagesoflauren
  28. willowfreakgaming reblogged this from doobler2
  29. nobleandmostancienthouseofpunk reblogged this from studio-zelda
  30. samham1331 reblogged this from pagesoflauren