knightsolaireofthesun:

agentjoneser:

ambris:

murkmen:

kuipernebula:

I love how the 5e corebook is very clear about how dragonborn do not have tails and literally every player and DM since has unilaterally said “That’s fucking dumb give them a tail :/”

if you give them a big stupid dragon head but no tail theyll be top heavy and fall over. this is so sad 1000 like

Tails are literally the most important part of ANYTHING. How dare they imply otherwise

I remember back in 3e and 3.5 when the descriptions of Tieflings emphasized how subtle their demonic features were supposed to be and all of my friends and I made Tieflings who were like “yeah I’ve got giant black horns and red claws and a barbed tail, what’s your fuckin’ problem?”

You can’t give players a race that’s obviously an outlet for their obscure fetishes and not give them a tail

  1. milesmentis reblogged this from thefandomcassandra
  2. mysteries-and-mindflayers reblogged this from singularity-days
  3. ganiling reblogged this from mori-esque
  4. effervescentmothman reblogged this from blue-the-flyingpyrochef
  5. blue-the-flyingpyrochef reblogged this from cheskamouse
  6. high-warlock-of-your-pants reblogged this from unseelieships
  7. unseelieships reblogged this from spearxwind
  8. free-birdgamer-gal reblogged this from averyboneyguy
  9. guy-who-reads reblogged this from dungeons-and-mothmans
  10. dungeons-and-mothmans reblogged this from chradi
  11. ilookatyourblog reblogged this from waltzfantasia-moved
  12. waltzfantasia-moved reblogged this from vainvaihe
  13. hands-of-fate-ocs reblogged this from goldenkenku
  14. mesterul-manole reblogged this from goldenkenku
  15. goldenkenku reblogged this from v0idbird
  16. norval17 reblogged this from v0idbird
  17. v0idbird reblogged this from lavenderhorns
  18. nobodysvoice22 reblogged this from kineticallyanywhere
  19. feniczoroark reblogged this from chefpyro
  20. kuipernebula posted this