chefpyro:

chefpyro:

chefpyro:

lady could never have the same connotations as lord. how can i boast my might while retaining my femininity? hmmm

image

no, that’s a bit much… empires are a bit too historically evil for my taste.

image

idk… you can be like. the lord of fire or whatever. and then that means something. that fire is YOURS. but the duchess of fire? madame of fire? all so temporary, so fleeting…

lady flame

  1. violetlectiophile reblogged this from pathos-logical
  2. pathos-logical reblogged this from chefpyro
  3. disinterestedh0mo reblogged this from chefpyro
  4. spooky-lesbian-touko-fukawa reblogged this from chefpyro
  5. blackoutace reblogged this from silver-tongues-blog and added:
    Lesbian of fire
  6. jub3r7 said: if we’re going by homestuck there’s always “Muse”, like you’re the being that inspires the existence of fire in the first place
  7. moosensweaters reblogged this from myneutralguardian
  8. myneutralguardian reblogged this from charredasperity
  9. thefiremind said: Just drop the “of”. “Lady Flame” sounds like “Lord of Fire” like Fire Lord Ozai. Or “Mother of Flame”? Can we get more context?
  10. arquillion said: Mistress
  11. whiny-twink-zashi said: Queen?
  12. ozriel-the-reaper reblogged this from chefpyro
  13. charredasperity reblogged this from chefpyro and added:
    Thats where you use a suffix instead.Like “[name], the great and powerful”, “[name], the Magnificent”, “[name],...
  14. mayflyinspace said: Dame of flame? Matron of the fire?
  15. naturecomics reblogged this from silver-tongues-blog and added:
    Queen of the Realm of the Eternal Flame
  16. because-im-freaking-greed said: queen? goddess?
  17. justylittletragey reblogged this from silver-tongues-blog
  18. solidm8-xd reblogged this from chefpyro
  19. infinite-scratch said: One above all
  20. incoherent-rambler said: Baroness
  21. water-the-plants said: sorceress
  22. chefpyro posted this