A person is remembered by their actions in life. They are loved depending on what message those actions send.
Things die when they are forgotten. Not just people, but everything. You ever wonder how many cities, people or even gods have been forgotten? When there is nothing to remind the universe you existed, that is when you finally die.
I assume you're not the friendliest to people who lack experience in dealing or communicating with trans people. That if I make the slightest mistake with using my pronouns or terms, I'll instantly be criticized. I realize this is just a stupid assumption, but I don't have much else to base my decisions off of. And thus I'm just silently admiring you/your blog from the background whilst in total confusion.
I can accept it when people do it by accident. A friend called me “he” by accident shortly after coming out because I didn’t tell them my prefered pronoun yet and I corrected them and they fixed it but the person who did it today knew and did it on purpose after expressing that they are comfortable with trans people, just not the most important parts of being trans. She knew exactly what she was doing.
Being gay was also considered a mental disease at first too, and you know how that turned out. I don't think telling anyone who wants to be/already are trans that they have a mental disorder would sit well with them.
Wait, when did mental diseases become relevant?
Last thing I said regarding LGBT was that trans (as well as the other things for that matter) are not a trend. You can’t just choose to be one. It straight up isn’t a choice. Acting like it is a choice is very disrespectful.
But they still see people as either heros or villains. (or neither if they don't like making that sort of decision.) Though I do agree with you. Opinions are horrible for decision making.
Heros and villains only exist in our minds. There is no such thing as good or evil. only those who win and those who lose.
So, you're basically trying to tell me the same thing I told you earlier? The person who punishes the people who try to do the right thing is the villain. The person who surpasses and succeeds at defeating the villain is the hero despite what they did to do it or what ends up happening next. Each villain can be seen as a hero by someone who thinks the person they are defeating is the villain. Each hero can be seen as a villain by someone who ends up losing despite their good nature.
No, I’m saying that it’s not black and white. Heros and villains are based on how people perceive them. Some people see heros as villains and some see villains as heros. It’s all a matter of perspective.
What some see as good, others see as evil
Whom some see as heroes, others see as villains.
It’s all based on who is telling the story.
Ah yes, the victim's creation of its killer. A pattern of the student surpassing its master. The paradox that proves perfection impossible. But although being a hero and being perfect are similar concepts, they are not the same... On the "'villians' were not inherently evil." part, I have to slightly disagree with you. Although we all have the potential to become good or evil when we are born, we cannot base our alignment on our potential. That is not how the world currently works...
I’m not basing it on their potential, I’m basing it on their cause vs their actions.
(I'm halfway through the third season, so try not to get ahead of that.) If you wanted to prove that Korra was indeed a villain herself, then you'd be trying to prove that all hypocrites are villains. In other words, "how can you call this good if bad comes from it?" If hypocrite=villain, then I should agree with you. But everyone is a hypocrite, and you cannot have an antagonist without a protagonist. I say a person is defined by what they stand for, not what they fall for.
I didn’t say she was a villain. I just said her actions caused most of the problems. And that the “villains” were not inherently evil.
The villain is the person who punished those who tried to do the right thing. The hero is the person who surpassed the other. Even a penny can be deemed a hero if it manages to overcome the villain. But let me also comment by saying that there is no such thing as order. Chaos is the thing that both creates order and destroys it. Enough chaos, and you destroy order. Enough order, and you only delay chaos.
Heros and Villains are but a social construct. We only see heroes and villains based on how we were raised.
Keep reading
"Every villain is a hero in their own mind" Unless that person is being a villain for the sake of being a villain. That person could also understand the evil in their actions, and eventually start begging their enemy to defeat them knowing that good must triumph over evil in the end. I already knew what you were attempting to do on that blog. I followed you because I believed we were similar, remember?
But the thing is, there is no such thing as good or evil. There is only chaos and order. Sometimes chaos is what helps the many and sometimes it’s order.
Would killing a king be okay if the king is corrupt? What if the nation goes into anarchy after the death of said king and someone goes to bring law into the kingdom once again? What if that person brings order through force and fear? Who is the villain? Who is the hero?
